Trash to Treasure: An In-Depth Analysis of Bangladesh’s Recycling Industry and its Circular Economy Potential

by
Automatic mineral water bottling plant 

Executive Summary

Bangladesh’s recycling industry presents a compelling paradox: it is simultaneously a powerful, poverty-driven engine of resource recovery and a sector fraught with systemic challenges, representing billions of dollars in untapped economic potential. Driven by rapid urbanization and robust economic growth, the nation faces a burgeoning waste crisis, with urban solid waste generation projected to increase nearly six-fold between 2021 and 2041.1 Formal municipal waste management systems are critically overwhelmed, collecting less than half of the waste generated and recycling a mere fraction through official channels.2

In this vacuum, a vast and complex informal economy has emerged, providing a vital lifeline for over 700,000 of the nation’s most marginalized citizens.4 This workforce forms the backbone of a surprisingly efficient collection and sorting system that feeds raw materials into various industries. However, this reliance on informal labor comes at a great cost: workers, including women and children, face hazardous conditions, social precarity, and exploitation for minimal pay.

The economic stakes are immense. The report finds significant “value leakage,” where valuable waste streams like pre-consumer textiles and plastics are either downcycled, exported cheaply, or lost entirely, costing the economy billions annually. The textile recycling sector alone holds a potential market value of up to $5 billion, while compliant e-waste recycling could generate a $500 million annual opportunity.5 Key sectors like shipbreaking, a global leader in volume, are undergoing a critical, albeit challenging, transition towards safer and greener practices, driven largely by international standards.7

Systemic barriers hinder the industry’s maturation. These include a critical lack of modern infrastructure, a persistent gap between progressive policies on paper—such as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)—and their on-the-ground enforcement, and technological limitations that keep much of the processing at a low-value level. The analysis reveals that international market pressures, such as EU regulations for textiles and the Hong Kong Convention for ship recycling, have been more effective drivers of reform than domestic policy alone.

The path forward lies in a strategic transition towards a circular economy. This requires a multi-pronged approach: targeted investment in advanced recycling technologies to capture lost value domestically; comprehensive policy reform focused on implementation and enforcement, particularly of source segregation; and, most critically, the formalization and integration of the informal workforce. Models such as the Recycling Business Unit (RBU) demonstrate a viable pathway, proving that social upliftment and economic efficiency can be mutually reinforcing.9 For Bangladesh, transforming its waste challenge into a sustainable economic asset is not merely an environmental goal but a strategic imperative for inclusive growth, industrial competitiveness, and long-term resilience.

I. The National Waste Landscape: Scale, Scope, and Systemic Challenges

1.1. The Deluge of Waste: Generation and Composition

Bangladesh is contending with a formidable and rapidly expanding stream of solid waste, a direct byproduct of its swift urbanization, population growth, and evolving consumption patterns.1 The country’s urban centers generate an estimated 25,000 to 33,000 tonnes of solid waste every day.1 This figure represents a dramatic escalation from approximately 6,500 tonnes per day in 1991 and is on a trajectory to reach a staggering 142,000 tonnes daily by 2041 if current trends persist.1 This projected near six-fold increase underscores the immense pressure on the nation’s nascent waste management infrastructure.

The composition of this municipal solid waste (MSW) presents a dual challenge and opportunity. The stream is overwhelmingly dominated by organic matter, such as food scraps and market waste, which constitutes between 50% and over 70% of the total volume.1 This high organic content results in waste that is wet and heavy, complicating collection and disposal, but also makes it an ideal feedstock for composting and waste-to-energy initiatives. The remaining fraction is a mix of recyclables and non-recyclables, including plastics (around 5–10%), paper and cardboard (roughly 2–5%), and textiles (around 3–4%).1 Critically, the shares of plastic waste and electronic waste (e-waste) are rising rapidly, reflecting the increased use of disposable packaging and digital devices.1

This surge in volume is driven not only by population growth but also by changing lifestyles. Per capita waste generation in urban areas currently stands at approximately 0.5 kg per day and is forecast to more than double to 1.1–1.2 kg by 2041.1 This indicates that individual consumption patterns are intensifying faster than the development of systems to manage their refuse. As the nation’s primary economic and population hub, Dhaka generates a disproportionate share of this waste, accounting for over 28% of the country’s total urban waste while housing 21% of its urban population.11

1.2. The Collection Conundrum: A Fractured System

The formal systems for waste collection and disposal are struggling to cope with the escalating volume. On average, municipal authorities formally collect only about 45% to 55% of the solid waste generated in urban areas.1 The vast quantity of uncollected waste is often disposed of indiscriminately—dumped on streets, in open fields, and directly into canals and rivers, or subjected to open burning.1 This practice creates severe public health crises, from the spread of vector-borne diseases like dengue to respiratory illnesses caused by toxic fumes, and leads to profound environmental degradation, including the clogging of urban drainage systems, which exacerbates flooding.1

Furthermore, the final disposal infrastructure is critically deficient. Bangladesh largely lacks engineered sanitary landfills designed for safe waste containment.1 The primary disposal sites for the capital, the Matuail and Amin Bazar landfills, are prime examples of this systemic failure. Both sites receive thousands of tonnes of garbage daily, operating far beyond their intended capacity and lifespan.1 They function more as open dumpsites than sanitary landfills, with inadequate leachate treatment and insufficient compacting, leading to the contamination of surrounding wetlands and water bodies.1 The increasing scarcity of land, particularly near dense urban centers, makes the simple expansion or creation of new landfills an increasingly expensive and unviable long-term solution, creating a significant bottleneck for future waste management planning.1

1.3. The Recycling Rate Paradox: Official Statistics vs. Ground Reality

Official data on recycling in Bangladesh reveals a significant paradox that points to a deeply bifurcated system. According to the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) “Municipal Waste Management (MWM) Survey 2022,” the national recycling rate for all solid waste was 15.59% in the 2020-2021 fiscal year.3 This figure, while modest, suggests a functioning recycling ecosystem.

However, a closer examination of the data reveals a starkly different picture at the municipal level. For the 8 million tonnes of solid waste produced by the country’s 342 municipalities, the recycling rate was a mere 3.15%.3 For the 3.9 million tonnes generated in the six major city corporations, the rate was only slightly better at 4.05%.3 The vast majority of this municipally managed waste ends up in landfills.3 This discrepancy between a relatively higher national average and extremely low municipal rates is not a simple statistical anomaly; it is a clear indicator that the bulk of recycling in Bangladesh occurs outside of the formal municipal solid waste management system. The national average is heavily inflated by large-scale, economically-driven industrial recycling operations, such as shipbreaking, where nearly 100% of materials are recovered, and the processing of pre-consumer textile waste, which handles hundreds of thousands of tonnes annually.16 These sectors operate largely in parallel to, rather than integrated with, the household waste stream. This reveals a critical disconnect in policy and practice: while the nation possesses powerful recycling capabilities in specific industrial niches, it has failed to establish a functional system for recovering value from the daily waste generated by its citizens.

This systemic failure at the municipal level is deeply rooted in the nature of the waste itself. The dominance of high-moisture organic content, combined with a near-total absence of waste segregation at the source, means that valuable recyclables like paper, plastic, and textiles are heavily contaminated by the time they are collected.1 This contamination drastically reduces their quality and market value, making large-scale, mechanized sorting both technologically challenging and economically unviable. Consequently, the entire system for recovering post-consumer recyclables is dependent on a vast informal workforce that manually salvages materials from mixed, unhygienic waste—a process that is only financially feasible due to precarious labor conditions and extremely low wages.4 Therefore, any attempt to formalize or technologically upgrade the recycling of municipal waste is fundamentally contingent on solving the “first mile” problem: implementing effective and mandatory source segregation at the household and commercial levels. Without this foundational step, the system will remain locked in a low-value, high-risk, and inefficient paradigm.

IndicatorValueYear/SourceKey Snippets
Total Urban Waste Generation25,000–33,000 tonnes/day2021 1Urban waste production surged from 6,500 tonnes/day in 1991 to over 33,000 tonnes/day by 2021.
Projected Urban Waste Generation142,000 tonnes/day2041 1If current trends continue, total waste generation could reach 142,000 tonnes per day by 2041.
Per Capita Urban Waste Generation0.52 kg/day2021 11Per capita municipal waste generation (urban) stands around 0.5 kg per day.
Average Urban Waste Collection Rate45–55%1On average, only about 45–50% of urban waste is formally collected by municipal authorities.
National Solid Waste Recycling Rate15.59%2020-21 3Nationwide, only 15.59 percent of the solid waste was recycled in 2020-2021.
Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Rate3.15%2020-21 3Only 3.15 percent of the 80 lakh tonnes of solid waste the 342 municipalities produced were recycled.
City Corporation Recycling Rate4.05%2020-21 34.05 percent of 39 lakh tonnes waste were recycled in the six city corporation areas.
Waste Composition (Urban)Organic: 50-70%, Plastic: 5-10%, Paper: 2-5%, Textiles: 3-4%1Food and other organic waste make up the majority of municipal solid waste.

Table 1: Key Waste Generation and Recycling Statistics for Bangladesh

II. Economic and Social Dimensions: A Duality of Potential and Precarity

2.1. The Billion-Dollar Potential: Market Sizing and Economic Contribution

The recycling sector in Bangladesh, though underdeveloped in many respects, represents a substantial and largely unrealized economic opportunity.21 Current inefficiencies in waste management come at a high cost; one study estimates that the failure to properly recycle waste deprives the country of over Tk 60 billion (approximately $510 million) in potential revenue each year.10 Analysis across key material streams reveals a multi-billion-dollar potential waiting to be unlocked.

  • Textiles: As the world’s second-largest apparel producer, Bangladesh is sitting on a veritable goldmine of textile waste. The global market for recycled textiles is projected to reach $9.4 billion by 2027.17 By developing a domestic capacity to process its own pre-consumer textile waste, known as
    jhut, Bangladesh could capture a significant share of this market, estimated to be worth between $1 billion and $5 billion annually.6 The direct economic benefits are twofold: generating an estimated $1.2 billion in revenue from the sale of recycled products and saving approximately $500 million to $700 million per year by substituting imported virgin cotton with locally recycled fiber.23
  • E-Waste: The rapidly growing stream of discarded electronics contains valuable materials like gold, silver, and copper. A formalized and compliant e-waste recycling industry could create an economic opportunity worth an estimated $500 million annually.5 Even after accounting for collection and processing costs, this could translate into $40-50 million in annual profits for the sector.5
  • Plastics: The domestic market for plastic products manufactured from waste is already robust, valued at approximately BDT 400 billion (around $3.4 billion).30 There is significant room for growth, particularly in foreign exchange earnings. It is estimated that if the plastic waste generated just within Dhaka were recycled using appropriate technology, it could generate approximately Tk 7 billion (around $60 million) in foreign exchange.10
  • Shipbreaking and Metals: The ship recycling industry is a major pillar of the national economy and a critical feeder for the domestic steel market, which itself is valued at BDT 55,000 crore (approximately $4.7 billion).8 The shipbreaking sector’s direct output is consistently valued at around Taka 53.3 billion (approximately $450 million) annually, and it contributes over Taka 5 billion (around $43 million) per year to government revenues through taxes and duties.32

2.2. A Lifeline for the Marginalized: Employment and Livelihood Generation

Beyond its macroeconomic potential, the recycling sector functions as a vital component of Bangladesh’s social fabric, providing a crucial economic lifeline for hundreds of thousands of its most vulnerable citizens. The industry is a cornerstone of the informal economy, directly supporting the livelihoods of over 700,000 people, many of whom come from marginalized and impoverished backgrounds.4 In Dhaka alone, an estimated 120,000 people are engaged in the waste recycling value chain.34

For these individuals, many of whom are recent migrants or lack the formal education needed to enter other sectors, waste is treasure.4 A single day’s collection of plastic, paper, or metal can fetch between Tk 300 and Tk 800, an income that, while precarious, is often sufficient to support a family.4 Other surveys corroborate these figures, finding that waste pickers in Dhaka earn between $2.92 and $5.73 per day (approximately Tk 340-670).35 The sector offers a low barrier to entry for roles such as waste picking, sorting, transportation, and operating basic machinery.4 For many workers, like Anwara Begum, a former day laborer, a job in a textile recycling plant provides a level of stability and security previously unattainable.4

The potential for scaled-up, dignified employment is significant. Formalization initiatives are already demonstrating this promise. The planned Circular Apparel Innovation Hub aims to create 50,000 new jobs, with a specific focus on empowering women.4 The innovative Recycling Business Unit (RBU) model for plastics has already transitioned over 3,500 informal workers into formal employment, 40% of whom are women.9 Similarly, a plastic recycling project in Faridpur is projected to create 2,000 new jobs for waste collectors and processors.36

This extensive reliance on the recycling sector for employment reveals its function as a de facto social safety net. In the absence of comprehensive formal social protection, the informal recycling economy absorbs a significant portion of the urban poor who would otherwise face destitution. It provides a market-based, albeit precarious, pathway for survival for those excluded from the formal labor market. This reality carries a profound policy implication: any intervention that aims to modernize or formalize the sector must proceed with extreme caution. Abruptly disrupting the existing informal collection networks without providing a viable and accessible alternative livelihood could have devastating social consequences, potentially pushing hundreds of thousands of families from a state of precarious stability into extreme poverty. Therefore, successful policy must focus on a strategy of integration and upliftment—improving conditions, increasing earnings, and providing protections—rather than one of simple replacement.

Furthermore, a critical analysis of the material flows within the recycling economy reveals a significant pattern of “value leakage,” particularly in the high-potential textile sector. Bangladesh’s world-class garment industry generates up to 577,000 tonnes of high-quality, pre-consumer textile waste annually.17 However, due to a domestic gap in advanced recycling technology and investment, over 55% of this valuable resource is exported at low prices to countries like India and Finland.6 These nations utilize sophisticated processes, such as chemical recycling, to transform the waste into high-value recycled fibers.17 In a striking illustration of this lost opportunity, some of these premium recycled fibers are then imported back into Bangladesh for use in its own export-oriented garment factories.17 This cycle—exporting a raw material cheaply only to buy back the value-added product at a premium—represents a massive economic inefficiency and a direct loss of foreign exchange, quantified by the estimated $500-$700 million that could be saved annually on cotton imports.23 This is not merely a waste management issue; it is an industrial policy failure. The most significant investment opportunity in the Bangladeshi recycling sector lies in closing this loop by “onshoring” the value-addition process. Investing in advanced domestic recycling technologies would allow Bangladesh to capture the full economic value of its waste stream, reduce its dependency on imported raw materials, and create a new tier of higher-skilled, higher-paying jobs in a burgeoning green industry.

III. Sectoral Deep Dive: Analysis of Key Recyclable Material Streams

3.1. Plastics: A Tale of Two Systems

The plastic recycling landscape in Bangladesh is characterized by a duality: a highly efficient, poverty-driven informal system coexists with a nascent but growing formal sector focused on higher-value materials and innovation.

The informal system is the primary engine of post-consumer plastic recovery. Driven by stark economic necessity, a vast network of waste pickers, dealers, and micro-entrepreneurs ensures that a significant portion of plastic waste is collected and reprocessed.18 Some assessments suggest that for certain types of easily identifiable and valuable plastics, the informal recycling rate approaches 100%, making it one of the most efficient systems in the world, albeit one built on precarious labor.18 This system typically channels sorted plastics into the production of low-grade items.18

Concurrently, a more formal sector is emerging, targeting higher-value streams, most notably Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottles.40 The demand for recycled PET (rPET) is increasingly driven by multinational corporations like Unilever and Coca-Cola, which have global sustainability commitments to incorporate recycled content into their packaging.40 This formalization is accompanied by technological innovation. Noteworthy examples include the “polyfuel” initiative in Jamalpur, which uses local technology to convert single-use plastics into diesel, petrol, and kerosene, and has been approved for a nationwide rollout.4 There is also growing interest and investment in advanced methods like chemical recycling, which can break down plastics into their chemical building blocks to create virgin-quality materials.41

Despite these pockets of efficiency and innovation, the sector faces immense challenges. The national recycling rate for all plastic waste is estimated to be only around 31-37%.39 The primary obstacle is the overwhelming volume of low-value, single-use, and multi-layered plastics, such as food wrappers, sachets, and thin polythene bags.10 These materials are difficult to collect and recycle, have low market value, and frequently contaminate more valuable plastic streams, ultimately leaking into the environment and clogging waterways.14 This creates a significant raw material supply gap for formal recyclers, who require a consistent stream of clean, sorted feedstock.40

3.2. Textiles: The ‘Jhut’ Goldmine

As a global powerhouse in apparel manufacturing, Bangladesh’s Ready-Made Garment (RMG) sector generates a colossal amount of pre-consumer textile waste, or jhut. Estimates place this volume between 500,000 and 577,000 tonnes annually, consisting primarily of high-quality cotton and cotton-blend cutting scraps.17 This waste stream represents one of the country’s most significant circular economy opportunities.

However, the current domestic capacity to capitalize on this resource is extremely limited. Only a small fraction, estimated at just 5% to 7%, of this waste is recycled locally into apparel-grade yarns that can be re-integrated into the high-value garment supply chain.6 The vast majority of

jhut follows one of two less valuable paths: it is either downcycled into low-grade products like mattress stuffing, furniture padding, and mops, capturing only a fraction of its potential worth 17; or it is exported as a cheap raw material to other countries, effectively offshoring the value-addition process.6

This status quo is rapidly becoming untenable due to powerful external pressures. International fashion brands like H&M and Decathlon, which are major buyers from Bangladesh, are aggressively pursuing sustainability targets that require increasing proportions of recycled content in their products.30 This is reinforced by stringent new regulations in key export markets, most notably the European Union’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, which will mandate circularity and recycled content.28 This confluence of market demand and regulatory pressure is creating an urgent and powerful incentive for Bangladesh to develop a sophisticated, high-value domestic textile recycling industry. Pioneering local companies such as BEXIMCO, CYCLO Recycled Fibers, and Recycle Raw are already moving to fill this gap, positioning themselves to meet the growing global demand for recycled textiles.27

3.3. Shipbreaking and Metals: A Global Leader in Transition

Bangladesh holds a dominant position in the global ship recycling industry, accounting for a substantial share of the international market—estimates range from 25% to 38% by tonnage—and dismantling over 200 large ocean-going vessels each year.16 The industry, concentrated along the coast of Chittagong, is a cornerstone of the national economy. It serves as the primary source of steel for the country, which lacks significant iron ore deposits, with nearly 100% of a dismantled ship’s materials being recycled or reused.16

Historically, this economic contribution has been overshadowed by the industry’s severe environmental and social costs. For decades, the sector was infamous for its dangerous “beaching” method, which led to widespread pollution of coastal ecosystems and an appalling worker safety record, with frequent fatal accidents and exposure to hazardous materials like asbestos and heavy metals.53

However, the industry is now in the midst of a significant, albeit challenging, transformation. The primary catalyst for this change has been international pressure, culminating in Bangladesh’s ratification of the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships.7 To comply with the convention’s standards, yards are making substantial capital investments to upgrade their facilities. This includes installing impermeable concrete floors to prevent soil and water contamination, adopting crane-based dismantling methods to move large sections to secure secondary cutting zones, and establishing proper hazardous waste management systems.7 A growing number of yards have successfully achieved “green” certification, signaling their compliance with these higher standards.8

Despite this progress, significant challenges remain. The transition to green recycling is capital-intensive, creating a divide between larger, well-funded operators and smaller yards that struggle to afford the necessary upgrades.7 Furthermore, the industry is highly susceptible to external economic shocks. The ongoing US dollar crisis in Bangladesh has complicated the process of opening Letters of Credit (LCs), which are essential for importing end-of-life vessels, thereby disrupting the raw material supply chain.57 Political instability and global shipping disruptions can also negatively impact trade flows and market stability.58

3.4. E-Waste: The Hazardous Horizon

Electronic waste represents the most hazardous and least formalized segment of Bangladesh’s recycling landscape. Fueled by rising incomes and rapid digitization, the volume of e-waste is escalating at an alarming rate. The country is estimated to generate approximately 3 million tonnes of e-waste annually, with projections indicating a rapid growth rate of 20% per year.29

This burgeoning waste stream is managed almost exclusively by the informal sector, which handles an estimated 97% of the total volume.29 This underground economy is highly dangerous. Lacking any formal infrastructure or regulatory oversight, workers—including a significant number of children—dismantle complex electronic devices using primitive and hazardous methods.62 Practices such as open burning of cables to recover copper and using acid baths to extract precious metals release a cocktail of toxic substances—including lead, mercury, cadmium, and carcinogenic flame retardants—directly into the air, soil, and water.29 Workers often operate without any personal protective equipment, leading to severe and chronic health problems, from respiratory illnesses and skin diseases to neurological damage.62

This dangerous reality exists alongside significant economic potential. The valuable materials contained within e-waste, such as gold, silver, copper, and rare earth elements, represent a potential market value of up to $500 million annually if recovered through compliant and safe processes.5 The sector already provides a precarious income for an estimated 120,000 people.62 However, the formal recycling capacity is virtually non-existent. A handful of companies, such as JR Recycling Solutions, are operating in this space, but they currently process less than 3% of the country’s total e-waste volume, highlighting the immense gap between the scale of the problem and the current formal response.5

3.5. Paper and Organics: Established and Emerging Streams

Paper: Bangladesh has a long-established paper recycling industry, supported by both formal enterprises and a well-developed informal collection network. Large companies like Magura Group operate mills that utilize pre- and post-consumer waste paper as a primary raw material, contributing to an import-substituting industrial sector.67 The sector also features notable social enterprises, such as BRAC’s Recycled Handmade Paper project, which creates sustainable livelihoods, particularly for rural women, by transforming waste paper and other fibrous materials into marketable products.70 The informal value chain for paper is highly structured, with collectors (

tokais and feriwalas), dealers, and aggregators facilitating a steady flow of material to the mills, with significant profit margins captured at each stage.20 Despite its maturity, the industry faces persistent challenges, including shortages of quality raw materials, intense competition from cheap and sometimes illegally imported paper, and operational disruptions caused by the national energy crisis.69

Organics: Given that organic matter constitutes the largest single component of municipal solid waste in Bangladesh, the potential for large-scale composting and biogas generation is immense.1 However, this potential remains largely untapped. The current practice of co-mingling organic waste with all other refuse leads to its disposal in overflowing landfills, where its anaerobic decomposition generates significant quantities of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. While the formal sector has yet to develop large-scale organic waste processing facilities, innovative, localized projects demonstrate the viability of such approaches. A notable example is a small-scale plant in Sakhipur, Tangail, initiated by a university student, which processes human waste and kitchen garbage from 50,000 people into valuable organic compost for agriculture.4 Such initiatives highlight a significant opportunity for decentralized, community-based waste management solutions that can improve soil health, reduce landfill pressure, and create local economic value.

The starkly different development trajectories of these various recycling sectors reveal a crucial dynamic: international market forces are the most powerful catalysts for change and formalization in Bangladesh’s recycling industry, often proving more influential than domestic policy alone. In the textile and shipbreaking sectors, the impetus for reform is unequivocally external. Garment manufacturers are investing in circularity and recycling not primarily due to local regulations, but to meet the stringent sustainability requirements of their European and American buyers and to comply with emerging EU laws.30 Similarly, shipyards are undertaking costly upgrades to achieve “green” certification in direct response to the mandates of the international Hong Kong Convention, which is essential for attracting business from global shipping lines.7 In stark contrast, sectors that primarily serve the domestic market and face less international scrutiny, such as post-consumer plastics and e-waste, remain overwhelmingly informal, technologically underdeveloped, and hazardous, despite the existence of national policies like the Solid Waste Management Rules.29 This suggests that for policymakers and investors, leveraging international trade, supply chain conditionalities, and global standards is the most effective lever for driving investment, technological upgrading, and improvements in labor and environmental performance. Domestic policy should therefore be strategically oriented to create an enabling environment that helps local industries meet these international benchmarks, thereby turning global pressure into a competitive advantage.

SectorAnnual Waste Generation (Tonnes)Current Domestic Recycling Rate (Est.)Economic Potential (USD)Key DriversPrimary ChallengesLevel of Formality
Plastics~1,000,000+ 1031-37% 39BDT 400 Bn ($3.4 Bn) domestic market 30Poverty (informal), Brand commitments (formal PET)Low-value/single-use plastics, contamination, supply gapHighly Informal (post-consumer), Semi-Formal (PET)
Textiles (Pre-consumer)500,000 – 577,000 175-7% (apparel-grade) 6$1-5 Bn export market 6EU regulations, International brand demandLack of advanced tech, opaque informal collection, value leakage via exportsHighly Informal (collection), Nascent Formal (processing)
Shipbreaking/Metals~1.8 million LDT (avg) 33~100% 16Taka 53.3 Bn ($450M) annual output 32Global shipping fleet turnover, Domestic steel demandEnvironmental/safety compliance costs, Economic instability (LC crisis)Formal (yards), Informal (downstream)
E-Waste~3,000,000 29<3% (formal) 29$500M annual opportunity 5Poverty, Demand for spare parts/metalsExtreme health hazards, toxic pollution, lack of infrastructureAlmost Entirely Informal (97%)
Paper~1.1 million tonnes collected (est.) 15~26% (Khulna study) 20N/ADomestic demand for packaging/printingRaw material shortages, energy costs, import competitionInformal (collection), Formal (mills)

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of Key Recycling Sectors in Bangladesh

IV. The Informal Economy: The Unsung Engine of Bangladesh’s Recycling Sector

4.1. Mapping the Value Chain: A Human-Powered System

The informal recycling economy in Bangladesh is not a chaotic free-for-all but a complex, multi-tiered, and highly organized system that serves as the de facto backbone of resource recovery for municipal solid waste.4 This human-powered value chain efficiently channels materials from dispersed points of generation to centralized industrial consumers.

  • Primary Collectors (‘Tokais’): At the very base of this pyramid are the tokais, or waste pickers. These are the most visible and most vulnerable actors in the chain. They perform the arduous task of manually sifting through mixed waste at its source—in community bins, along roadsides, and at large municipal dumpsites like Matuail—to salvage recyclable materials.12 Their work is essential for the initial recovery of materials from the waste stream.
  • Itinerant Buyers (‘Feriwalas’): Operating a step above the tokais are the feriwalas. These itinerant buyers travel door-to-door, purchasing separated recyclable items like paper, bottles, and metal directly from households, shops, and offices.3 By doing so, they tap into a cleaner, less contaminated stream of materials and play a crucial role in incentivizing source separation at a micro-level.
  • Small-Scale Dealers (‘Vangari’ Shops): The materials collected by both tokais and feriwalas are sold to local, small-scale dealers who operate vangari shops. These shops act as the first critical point of aggregation and primary processing. Here, waste is further sorted by type and grade (e.g., separating different types of plastic polymers), cleaned of major contaminants, and bundled for sale to larger players.19
  • Wholesalers and Brokers: At the top of the informal chain are the wholesalers and brokers. These larger enterprises purchase materials in bulk from numerous vangari shops. They possess the space and rudimentary equipment to perform secondary processing, such as baling paper, shredding plastics, or pressing metal cans. They then aggregate these materials into commercially viable quantities and act as the primary suppliers to the formal recycling industries, bridging the gap between the informal collection network and the formal manufacturing sector.18

4.2. A Precarious Existence: Health, Safety, and Social Stigma

While the informal sector is the engine of recycling, the human cost is immense. The lives of its workers are defined by precarity, hazardous conditions, and a lack of basic rights and protections.

Workers operate in extremely unsanitary and dangerous environments, often without any form of personal protective equipment (PPE).4 The simple plea for gloves by a worker named Fatema Bibi encapsulates this fundamental deprivation.4 This lack of protection leads to a high incidence of cuts, infections, and injuries, as well as chronic exposure to a range of hazardous materials, from toxic chemicals in e-waste and industrial scraps to pathogens in mixed municipal refuse.13

The work is characterized by long, grueling hours for low and highly variable incomes, with no job security, health benefits, paid sick leave, or access to any formal social protection mechanisms.17 The problem of child labor is particularly acute and pervasive, especially in the most hazardous sectors like e-waste dismantling and shipbreaking, where children are exposed to life-threatening conditions.12 Women form a large part of the workforce, particularly in the meticulous sorting roles within textile and plastic waste workshops, but they often face additional layers of vulnerability, including systemic wage disparities, a lack of basic facilities like clean drinking water, and the risk of harassment.17

4.3. Pathways to Formalization: Models for Integration and Empowerment

Recognizing both the vital role and the deep-seated vulnerabilities of the informal sector, development experts and innovative enterprises are exploring pathways to formalize and integrate these workers into a more dignified and equitable system. Formalization is not merely about regulation; it is about empowerment and value creation. Studies suggest that organizing informal workers into cooperatives and creating partnerships with municipal authorities could increase their incomes by as much as 25% while simultaneously improving collection efficiency and environmental outcomes.4

A leading example of a successful integration model is the Recycling Business Unit (RBU), a project supported by the World Bank and implemented by the Bangladesh Petrochemical Company Ltd (BPCL).9 This model represents a paradigm shift from exploitation to empowerment. Instead of replacing the informal collectors, the RBU model establishes decentralized pre-processing hubs in areas with high plastic leakage. These hubs offer formal employment contracts to former waste pickers, transforming their working conditions. Workers are provided with safety gear, access to proper sanitation facilities, on-site medical services, and even childcare support. Critically, the model replaces opaque, cash-based transactions with middlemen by implementing secure digital payment systems, which enhances transparency, ensures fair payment, and promotes financial inclusion. By formalizing their role, the RBU model integrates these workers into a traceable, compliant, and high-value supply chain that feeds quality-controlled feedstock to the formal recycling industry.9

This approach of integration rather than displacement is seen as a key strategy across different waste streams. In the hazardous e-waste sector, for instance, providing training, equipment, and a formal structure for the existing informal workforce is considered the most viable solution for improving safety standards and increasing the rate of valuable resource recovery.29

The persistence and efficiency of the informal value chain, despite its exploitative nature, points to a crucial reality: it provides a highly effective, market-driven solution for material sorting that formal, mechanized systems in Bangladesh cannot currently replicate at a comparable cost or scale. The manual sorting performed by hundreds of thousands of workers is economically viable precisely because of the low cost of labor.4 Large, capital-intensive Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs), common in developed countries, are ill-suited to the Bangladeshi context. They are expensive to build and maintain, and their technology struggles to efficiently process the wet, organic-heavy, and unsegregated waste that characterizes the municipal stream. Therefore, the informal sector provides an indispensable service of primary sorting that underpins the entire recycling industry, including the formal factories that ultimately purchase the sorted materials from informal wholesalers. This understanding reframes the strategic challenge. The most effective approach is not to attempt to replace this human-powered system with potentially inappropriate and costly technology, but rather to “plug into” and upgrade the existing infrastructure. The RBU model is a prime example of this strategy in action. It does not eliminate the collectors; it formalizes their role, professionalizes their work, and vastly improves their conditions, thereby preserving the inherent efficiency of manual sorting while systematically removing the elements of exploitation and hazard.

V. Navigating the Headwinds: Critical Challenges and Systemic Barriers

Despite its significant socio-economic contributions and vast potential, the recycling industry in Bangladesh is constrained by a formidable set of interconnected challenges that span infrastructure, technology, policy, and human capital. These systemic barriers prevent the sector from achieving scale, efficiency, and sustainability.

5.1. Infrastructure and Technological Deficits

A fundamental challenge across nearly all recycling streams is the severe lack of adequate infrastructure and modern technology.

  • Waste Management Infrastructure: As previously noted, the country lacks a network of engineered sanitary landfills, and formal collection systems are insufficient, covering only about half of the urban waste generated.1 This foundational failure in waste management—specifically the absence of source segregation—contaminates recyclable materials, making downstream processing difficult and costly.1
  • Recycling Facilities: The number of modern, formal recycling facilities is limited. In 2018, only 200 of the 3,000 plastic recycling facilities were formally registered.39 The textile sector has only about 50 dedicated recycling plants, a tiny number relative to its 3,500 garment factories.28 Similarly, the formal e-waste recycling rate is a mere 3%, reflecting a near-total absence of proper facilities.29 Many existing plants, particularly in the informal sector, use outdated, inefficient, and often hazardous locally fabricated machinery.18
  • Technological Gap: Bangladesh lags in the adoption of advanced recycling technologies. In the textile sector, the lack of chemical recycling capabilities is a primary reason for the export of high-value cotton waste.17 In plastics, while mechanical recycling is prevalent, the ability to handle complex or contaminated streams is limited, and advanced processes like pyrolysis and gasification are still in their infancy.41 This technological gap keeps the industry locked in a cycle of producing lower-grade, lower-value recycled products.18

5.2. Policy Gaps and Enforcement Failures

While Bangladesh has developed a framework of environmental policies, a significant gap exists between legislation and on-the-ground implementation.

  • Weak Enforcement: Laws and regulations are often poorly enforced. A ban on polythene bags has been in place since 2002, yet their use remains widespread due to a lack of consistent enforcement.14 Similarly, laws requiring industries to manage their waste properly often lack monitoring and penalties for non-compliance.1
  • Unrealized Policies: Key progressive policies remain largely on paper. The Solid Waste Management Rules of 2021 introduced the crucial concept of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which would make manufacturers financially responsible for the end-of-life management of their products.1 However, a clear, actionable framework for EPR implementation is still lacking, meaning producers are not yet held accountable for packaging or e-waste.1 The rules also call for mandatory source segregation, but this has not been translated into widespread practice.1
  • Informal Sector Blind Spot: The policy framework largely overlooks the informal recycling sector. There is no formal registration system, data collection, or specific policies designed to support and integrate this massive workforce.6 This lack of recognition perpetuates the sector’s precarity and hinders efforts to improve working conditions and efficiency.71

5.3. Health, Safety, and Environmental Hazards

The operational practices within much of the recycling industry, particularly the informal segments, pose severe risks to human health and the environment.

  • Worker Safety: As detailed extensively, informal workers are exposed to a myriad of dangers. They handle sharp objects, hazardous chemicals, and infectious waste without protective gear, leading to high rates of injury and chronic illness.4 The shipbreaking industry, despite recent improvements, has a long history of fatal accidents.52 In e-waste recycling, exposure to heavy metals like lead and mercury causes severe neurological and respiratory disorders.29
  • Environmental Pollution: Improper recycling and disposal practices are a major source of pollution. The open burning of plastics and e-waste releases toxic dioxins and furans into the atmosphere.1 Uncontrolled dumping and leachate from non-sanitary landfills contaminate soil and groundwater.1 In the shipbreaking yards of Chittagong, the discharge of oil, asbestos, and heavy metals has devastated local marine ecosystems, with studies showing the disappearance of 25 fish species over 20 years.53

5.4. Economic and Financial Barriers

The growth of a modern, formal recycling industry is also hampered by significant economic and financial obstacles.

  • Access to Finance: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the recycling sector struggle to access financing for capital investment and operational costs.18 While the central bank offers refinancing facilities for green projects, the conditions can be stringent and difficult for smaller enterprises to meet.80 The entire MSME sector in Bangladesh faces a financing deficit of $2.8 billion.30
  • Market Volatility and Supply Chain Issues: Sectors reliant on imports, such as shipbreaking and paper, are vulnerable to global price fluctuations and supply chain disruptions.57 The recent US dollar crisis in Bangladesh has made it difficult for businesses to open Letters of Credit (LCs), severely constraining the import of raw materials like end-of-life ships and waste paper pulp.57
  • Lack of Public Awareness: Widespread public awareness about the importance of recycling and proper waste disposal remains low.2 This contributes to the prevalence of littering and the failure of source segregation initiatives, which are fundamental to creating a clean and valuable stream of recyclable materials.1

VI. Policy, Governance, and the Path Forward

The government of Bangladesh has established a foundational legal and strategic framework for waste management and recycling. However, the effectiveness of this framework is severely undermined by a persistent gap between policy formulation and practical implementation. The path to a sustainable and prosperous recycling industry hinges on bridging this gap through strengthened governance, targeted enforcement, and strategic policy evolution.

6.1. Existing Legal and Policy Framework

Bangladesh’s approach to waste management is guided by several key laws, rules, and strategies:

  • The Environment Conservation Act, 1995 (Amended 2002): This is the principal environmental law in the country. Section 6A specifically grants the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) the authority to regulate the production and use of polythene products, forming the legal basis for the ban on single-use plastic bags.10
  • Solid Waste Management Rules, 2021: Issued under the Environment Conservation Act, these are the most comprehensive regulations to date. They introduce several progressive concepts for the first time in Bangladesh, including:
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Chapter 9 of the rules outlines the principle of EPR, making producers responsible for the post-consumer management of their products and packaging.1
  • Mandatory Source Segregation: The rules call for the separation of waste at the household level to facilitate recycling and composting.1
  • Operational Standards: They provide specific guidelines for the operation of landfills and waste incineration facilities, including emission standards.80
  • National 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) Strategy (2010): This strategic document provides a guiding framework for municipalities and city corporations to improve their solid waste management practices by prioritizing waste minimization and resource recovery.79
  • Sector-Specific Regulations:
  • Mandatory Jute Packaging Act, 2010: This law promotes a biodegradable alternative to plastic by mandating the use of jute sacks for packaging 19 different commodities, including rice, wheat, and sugar.78
  • Hazardous Waste (E-Waste) Management Rules, 2021: These rules specifically address the growing challenge of e-waste, requiring producers and recyclers to develop and submit formal management plans.29
  • Ship Recycling Act, 2018: This legislation aims to regulate the shipbreaking industry, bringing it into alignment with international standards, particularly the Hong Kong Convention.7

6.2. The Implementation and Enforcement Deficit

Despite this relatively robust legal framework on paper, the reality on the ground is one of weak enforcement and stalled implementation. The gap between policy intent and actual practice is the single greatest governance challenge facing the sector.

  • Lack of Enforcement: The 2002 ban on polythene bags is a prime example. Decades after its enactment, single-use plastic bags remain ubiquitous due to inconsistent enforcement and a lack of viable, widely available alternatives.77 Similarly, there are few penalties or effective monitoring mechanisms to ensure industries comply with waste management regulations.1
  • EPR and Source Segregation Failure: The progressive policies introduced in the 2021 Rules have yet to be translated into action. There is no clear, operational framework for implementing EPR, leaving the principle inert.1 Likewise, mandatory source segregation has not been rolled out at scale, and public awareness campaigns to support it have been limited and ineffective.1 This failure at the source perpetuates the contamination of the entire waste stream.
  • Institutional Weaknesses: Municipal waste management is chronically under-resourced, lacking the financial capacity, technical expertise, and necessary equipment to fulfill its mandate.1 There is also a lack of effective coordination between the various government agencies involved, including city corporations, the MoEFCC, and local government divisions, which hinders the development of integrated waste management plans.1

6.3. Strategic Imperatives for Governance Reform

To unlock the potential of the recycling industry, a concerted effort is needed to move from policy formulation to decisive action. Key strategic imperatives include:

  • Prioritizing Implementation: The government must shift its focus from creating new policies to rigorously implementing existing ones. This requires allocating sufficient budgets for enforcement, building the capacity of regulatory bodies like the Department of Environment (DoE), and establishing clear, time-bound action plans for policies like EPR and source segregation.
  • Developing an Actionable EPR Framework: A dedicated, action-oriented policy for EPR is urgently needed.80 This should identify specific product categories, establish clear recycling and waste reduction targets for producers, and implement a system of fees and penalties to ensure compliance. This would create a much-needed funding stream to support collection and recycling infrastructure.
  • Formalizing the Informal Sector: A significant policy gap is the lack of recognition for the informal economy.6 The government should develop policies to formally integrate informal workers, providing them with legal recognition, training in health and safety, access to social protection, and support to form cooperatives. This would not only improve livelihoods but also enhance the efficiency and transparency of the entire recycling value chain.
  • Strengthening Local Government Capacity: Municipalities and city corporations must be empowered to effectively manage waste. This requires increased financial allocations from the central government, investment in modern collection and transportation infrastructure, and technical assistance to develop and implement integrated solid waste management plans.
  • Fostering Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): The scale of the investment required for modern recycling infrastructure necessitates collaboration between the public and private sectors. The government can create an enabling environment for private investment by offering financial incentives, streamlining regulations, and developing clear frameworks for PPPs in areas like waste-to-energy, composting, and advanced recycling facilities.

VII. The Circular Economy Transition: Future Outlook and Strategic Recommendations

The future of Bangladesh’s recycling industry is intrinsically linked to the global shift from a linear “take-make-dispose” economic model to a circular one, where resources are kept in use for as long as possible, extracting maximum value before being recovered and regenerated.30 For Bangladesh, a densely populated and resource-constrained nation, this transition is not merely an environmental aspiration but a critical strategy for sustainable economic growth, industrial resilience, and climate change adaptation.30

7.1. The Future Outlook and Growth Potential

The outlook for the recycling sector is one of immense potential, driven by a confluence of domestic needs and powerful international market forces.

  • Textile Recycling as a Strategic Priority: The textile sector is poised to lead Bangladesh’s circular transition. With global brands and EU regulations demanding higher recycled content, the country has a unique opportunity to transform its massive pre-consumer waste stream from a liability into a multi-billion-dollar asset.6 The future lies in significant investment in advanced mechanical and chemical recycling technologies to produce high-value fibers domestically, thereby reducing import dependency, capturing more value, and positioning Bangladesh as a global leader in sustainable apparel manufacturing.24
  • Greening the Ship Recycling Industry: The ongoing reforms in the shipbreaking sector are set to continue, driven by the implementation of the Hong Kong Convention.7 As more yards achieve “green” certification, Bangladesh can consolidate its market leadership by attracting business from environmentally conscious shipping lines, potentially commanding premium prices. The coming decade is expected to see a boom in the number of ships needing recycling, presenting a significant opportunity for the compliant yards.8
  • Formalizing High-Value Niche Sectors: Sectors like e-waste and PET plastic recycling hold enormous, largely untapped value. The future growth of these sectors depends on moving from the current hazardous, informal model to a formal, technology-driven one. This will require targeted investments in safe processing facilities and the creation of effective collection systems, likely built upon an EPR framework.29
  • Waste-to-Value Innovations: As land for dumpsites becomes ever scarcer, innovative waste-to-value technologies will become increasingly critical. This includes expanding community-based composting for organic waste, scaling up plastic-to-fuel initiatives, and exploring the feasibility of modern waste-to-energy plants for non-recyclable waste.4

7.2. Strategic Recommendations

To harness this potential and navigate the transition to a circular economy, a coordinated and strategic approach is required from all stakeholders. The following recommendations are proposed for government, industry, and development partners:

For Government and Policymakers:

  1. Enforce Existing Policies with Urgency: Move from policy formulation to action. Create a time-bound, fully-funded roadmap for the nationwide implementation of the Solid Waste Management Rules 2021, with a primary focus on establishing mandatory source segregation and an operational EPR system.
  2. Develop a National Circular Economy Strategy: Formulate a comprehensive national strategy that sets clear, quantitative targets for recycling rates, waste reduction, and the use of recycled content across key industries (textiles, plastics, construction).81 This strategy should be integrated into national development plans, such as the Five-Year Plans.
  3. Incentivize Investment in Green Technology: Create a favorable investment climate for advanced recycling technologies. This can be achieved through targeted financial incentives such as tax exemptions for recycling equipment, reduced bank loan rates, and green financing schemes with accessible conditions for SMEs.10 Specifically, prioritize investments that close the “value leakage” loop in the textile sector.
  4. Formally Integrate and Empower the Informal Sector: Develop a national program to register, train, and equip informal waste workers. Support the formation of waste picker cooperatives and integrate them as official partners in municipal collection systems, following the principles of successful models like the RBU. Ensure they have access to social safety nets and occupational health services.

For Industry and the Private Sector:

  1. Invest in Domestic Recycling Capacity: The RMG and plastics industries should proactively invest in building state-of-the-art domestic recycling facilities. This is not just a matter of corporate social responsibility but a strategic necessity to meet future buyer requirements and secure supply chain resilience.
  2. Embrace Circular Design Principles: Manufacturers should innovate in product and packaging design to facilitate reuse, repair, and recycling. This includes phasing out non-recyclable materials (like multi-layer plastics) and designing products for easy disassembly.
  3. Collaborate to Build Traceable Supply Chains: Industry associations like the BGMEA should lead efforts to create transparent and traceable supply chains for waste materials. This involves working with informal sector aggregators to formalize collection and ensure a steady, quality-controlled supply of feedstock for recyclers, which is a key prerequisite for large-scale investment.6

For International Development Partners and Investors:

  1. Fund Catalytic Infrastructure Projects: Provide blended finance, grants, and technical assistance for critical “first-mover” infrastructure projects, such as advanced textile recycling plants, e-waste processing facilities, and sanitary landfills with integrated resource recovery. The recent $200 million financing from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) for solid waste management is a positive step in this direction.90
  2. Support Policy Implementation and Capacity Building: Offer technical assistance to government agencies to help them design and implement complex policies like EPR. Support capacity-building programs for municipal authorities to improve their waste management planning and operational capabilities.
  3. Promote a Just Transition: Ensure that all funded projects prioritize the rights and well-being of informal workers. Support initiatives that focus on skills development, occupational health and safety, and the creation of dignified, green jobs for the most vulnerable populations who currently depend on waste for their survival.

By embracing these strategic recommendations, Bangladesh can transform its mounting waste crisis into a powerful engine for sustainable development, creating a truly circular economy that is not only environmentally sound but also economically prosperous and socially inclusive.

Works cited

  1. Waste Crisis in Bangladesh – Problems, Policies & Solutions – LightCastle Partners, accessed July 22, 2025, https://lightcastlepartners.com/insights/2025/07/waste-management-bangladesh-trash-to-treasure/
  2. Urban Waste Management in Bangladesh: An Overview with a Focus on Dhaka – Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), accessed July 22, 2025, https://asef.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ASEFSU23-Background-Paper_Waste-Management-in-Bangladesh.pdf
  3. Cities of Bangladesh are awful at recycling waste. Here is how we can solve it, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/features/panorama/cities-bangladesh-are-awful-recycling-waste-here-how-we-can-solve-it-739038
  4. Turning trash into treasure: Bangladesh’s recycling industry, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.jagonews24.com/en/business/news/82621
  5. E-waste recycling offers $500m annual business potential for …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/e-waste-recycling-offers-500m-annual-business-potential-bangladesh-experts-966921
  6. Lack of policy framework to cost Bangladesh $5bn in recycled textile exports – Just Style, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.just-style.com/news/5bn-in-bangladesh-textile-waste-exports-lost-to-policy-gaps/
  7. Bangladesh’s Ship Recycling Industry Undergoes Major Reforms Amid Global Pressure, accessed July 22, 2025, https://shippinginbox.com/bangladeshs-ship-recycling-industry-undergoes-major-reforms-amid-global-pressure/
  8. Turning the tide: Bangladesh shipbreaking sheds hazardous past for green future, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/turning-tide-bangladesh-shipbreaking-sheds-hazardous-past-green-future-1175006
  9. How Bangladesh is giving waste new life, and workers new dignity …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://asianews.network/how-bangladesh-is-giving-waste-new-life-and-workers-new-dignity/
  10. Bangladesh’s Plastic Tide: A Nation Grappling with a Mounting Crisis, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ishr.org/bangladeshs-plastic-tide-a-nation-grappling-with-a-mounting-crisis/
  11. Bangladesh Waste Database 2021, accessed July 22, 2025, https://wasteconcern.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/22-Bangladesh-Waste-Database_2.pdf
  12. Precarious informal waste recycling in Dhaka, Bangladesh – Ej Atlas, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ejatlas.org/print/waste-worries-and-precarious-informal-recycling-in-dhaka-bangladesh
  13. Bangladesh’s plastic crisis fuels a dangerous underground recycling economy – EHN, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.ehn.org/bangladeshs-plastic-crisis-fuels-a-dangerous-underground-recycling-economy
  14. WRAPPED IN PLASTIC: THE STATE OF PLASTIC POLLUTION IN BANGLADESH – International Growth Centre, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.theigc.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/Wrapped-in-Plastic-The-State-of-Plastic-Pollution-in-Bangladesh.pdf
  15. Bangladesh Team – UN Statistics Division, accessed July 22, 2025, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envstats/fdes/EGES10/2.2.5%20Revised%20Waste%20Statistics_Bangladesh.pdf
  16. A Review on Ship Recycling Industry in Bangladesh from Global Perspective – Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy, accessed July 22, 2025, https://cbe.miis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=joce
  17. Textile giant Bangladesh pushed to recycle more waste | The Straits Times, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/textile-giant-bangladesh-pushed-to-recycle-more-waste
  18. WASTE RECYCLING IN BANGLADESH-AN OVERVIEW – Mohammad Saifullah – Journal of Science and Technology, accessed July 22, 2025, https://jst.hstu.ac.bd/home/assets_vcc/files/vol_6/21_JST_06_21.pdf
  19. plastic waste recycling and its opportunities in … – Waste Concern, accessed July 22, 2025, https://wasteconcern.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a821f4c-762b-4f04-ae42-afa1f9554dd5.pdf
  20. RECYCLING APPROACH OF WASTE PAPER AND PLASTIC IN KHULNA CITY OF BANGLADESH JES, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www2.kuet.ac.bd/JES/images/files/v3/v3j18.pdf
  21. Unlocking Bangladesh’s Recycling Potential: Transforming Waste into Economic Opportunity – Textile Focus, accessed July 22, 2025, https://textilefocus.com/unlocking-bangladeshs-recycling-potential-transforming-waste-into-economic-opportunity/
  22. Bangladesh: Apparel industry under pressure to reform waste practices amid rising global demand for fast fashion recycling, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/bangladesh-worlds-second-largest-apparel-producer-under-pressure-to-reform-waste-practices-amid-rising-global-demand-for-fashion-industry-recycling/
  23. Textile giant Bangladesh pushed to recycle more waste | News – Eco-Business, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.eco-business.com/news/textile-giant-bangladesh-pushed-to-recycle-more-waste/
  24. Bangladesh’s textile waste crisis threatens industry’s future | EasternEye, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.easterneye.biz/bangladesh-textile-industry-waste/
  25. Bangladesh poised to tap into $1bn textile recycling market, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/bangladesh-poised-to-tap-into-1bn-textile-recycling-market
  26. Bangladesh urged to boost textile recycling, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.wtin.com/article/2024/august/26-08-24/bangladesh-urged-to-boost-textile-recycling/
  27. Revolutionizing textile recycling in Bangladesh: A journey with Dell’Orco & Villani, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.texspacetoday.com/textile-recycling-a-journey-with-dellorco-villani/
  28. Growing potential of textile waste recycling in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/growing-potential-of-textile-waste-recycling-in-bangladesh
  29. E-Waste Statistics in Bangladesh 2024: Current Trends and Future Prospects, accessed July 22, 2025, https://jrrecyclingsolutionsltd.com.bd/blog/e-waste-statistics-in-bangladesh-2024
  30. Strategic Insights for Bangladesh’s Circular Economy – LightCastle Partners, accessed July 22, 2025, https://lightcastlepartners.com/insights/2024/06/strategic-insights-for-bangladeshs-circular-economy/
  31. THE STEEL INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH … – IDLC, accessed July 22, 2025, https://idlc.com/mbr/images/public/2fdDh7DVanCKDSPjMhvjxq.pdf
  32. Contributions of Ship Recycling in Bangladesh: An Economic Assessment – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317551378_Contributions_of_Ship_Recycling_in_Bangladesh_An_Economic_Assessment
  33. Contributions of Ship Recycling in Bangladesh: – International Maritime Organization, accessed July 22, 2025, https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/PartnershipsProjects/Documents/Ship%20recycling/WP1a%20Economic%20Impacts%20Study.pdf
  34. Circular economy model for developing countries: evidence from …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9160040/
  35. Daily income range of the waste pickers in Dhaka in BDT (1 USD = 80… – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Daily-income-range-of-the-waste-pickers-in-Dhaka-in-BDT-1-USD80-BDT-Colour-figure-can_fig5_340735822
  36. Valuing plastic in Bangladesh – Practical Action, accessed July 22, 2025, https://practicalaction.org/our-work/projects/recycling-plastic/
  37. Increasing Employment by Creating Value from Plastic Waste in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://danida-business-partnerships.dk/projects/increasing-employment-by-creating-value-from-plastic-waste-in-bangladesh/
  38. Textile giant Bangladesh pushed to recycle more waste | Context by TRF, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.context.news/just-transition/textile-giant-bangladesh-pushed-to-recycle-more-waste
  39. From Trash to Treasure: Microenterprises lead the way for recycling in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/endpovertyinsouthasia/from-trash-to-treasure–microenterprises-lead-the-way-for-recycl
  40. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Recycling in Bangladesh: Current Status and Future Sustainability Prospects – IEOM Society, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/bangladesh2024/148.pdf
  41. Sustainable Recycling of Plastic Waste: Context in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.meet-bangladesh.com/post-details/sustainable-recycling-of-plastic-waste-context-in-bangladesh
  42. Understanding plastic recycling in Bangladesh – Dhaka Tribune, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.dhakatribune.com/opinion/longform/314956/understanding-plastic-recycling-in-bangladesh
  43. Chemical Based Plastic Recycling in Bangladesh – KS Rubber Industries, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ksrubbers.com/chemical-based-plastic-recycling-in-bangladesh/
  44. PLASTIC POLLUTION IN BANGLADESH – DRIVERS, IMPACTS …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://cpd.org.bd/resources/2023/04/Plastic-Pollution-in-Bangladesh-Drivers-Impacts-and-Solutions.pdf
  45. Circular industry in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://industryinsiderbd.com/circular-industry-in-bangladesh/
  46. (PDF) The single-use plastic waste problem in Bangladesh: finding sustainable alternatives in local and global context – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374029458_The_single-use_plastic_waste_problem_in_Bangladesh_finding_sustainable_alternatives_in_local_and_global_context
  47. Bangladesh’s textile waste crisis spurs recycling push – TexSPACE Today, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.texspacetoday.com/bangladeshs-textile-waste-crisis-spurs-recycling-push/
  48. Bangladesh faces growing pressure to increase textile waste recycling amid industry expansion – Apparel Resources, accessed July 22, 2025, https://apparelresources.com/business-news/sustainability/bangladesh-faces-growing-pressure-increase-textile-waste-recycling-amid-industry-expansion/
  49. child rights and informal textile waste recycling in bangladesh | unicef, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/childrightsandbusiness/media/1196/file/SupplementaryReport-ChildRights-Textile-Waste-Recycling-Bangladesh-2024.pdf
  50. Bangladesh ramps up use of recycled fabrics in ready-made garments – Mongabay, accessed July 22, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/2023/07/bangladesh-ramps-up-use-of-recycled-fabrics-in-ready-made-garments/
  51. Who we are, accessed July 22, 2025, https://samratmarineint.com/page/31?p=Who%20we%20are
  52. Bangladesh shipyards brace for recycling boom | Context by TRF, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.context.news/just-transition/bangladesh-shipyards-brace-for-recycling-boom
  53. Scrapping ships in Bangladesh | DW Documentary – YouTube, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ6c0EAS0aY&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
  54. Ship Breaking and Recycling Industry of Bangladesh; Issues and Challenges, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319948181_Ship_Breaking_and_Recycling_Industry_of_Bangladesh_Issues_and_Challenges
  55. NRGroupBD – All Kind of Scrap Metal Exporter, accessed July 22, 2025, https://nrgroupbd.co/
  56. Bangladesh moves to strengthen ship recycling and hazardous waste laws, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/Pages/WhatsNew-2229.aspx
  57. Bangladesh steel industry faces challenges – SteelRadar, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.steelradar.com/en/haber/bangladesh-steel-industry-faces-challenges/
  58. What is the current scenario of steel and recycling industry in Bangladesh? – BigMint, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bigmint.co/insights/detail/what-is-the-current-scenario-of-steel-and-recycling-industry-in-bangladesh-567655
  59. Political and economic instability weakens Bangladesh’s scrap demand – Steel Radar, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.steelradar.com/en/political-and-economic-instability-weakens-bangladeshs-scrap-demand/
  60. Metals market: An overview – Waste & Recycling Middle East and Africa, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.wasterecyclingmea.com/news/metal-recycling/metals-market-an-overview
  61. Impact of E-Waste on Informal Workers in Bangladesh: A Comprehensive Analysis, accessed July 22, 2025, https://jrrecyclingsolutionsltd.com.bd/blog/impact-of-e-waste-on-informal-workers-in-bangladesh
  62. The Multifaceted Challenges of E-waste Repair and Recycling in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371666999_The_Multifaceted_Challenges_of_E-waste_Repair_and_Recycling_in_Bangladesh
  63. (PDF) E-Waste management in Bangladesh: Present Trend and Future Implication, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267762865_E-Waste_management_in_Bangladesh_Present_Trend_and_Future_Implication
  64. Studies in Bangladesh detail how e-waste recycling exposes workers to chemicals, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2022/09/004.html
  65. Environmental impact of e-waste in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://jrrecyclingsolutionsltd.com.bd/blog/environmental-impact-of-e-waste-in-bangladesh
  66. JR Recycling Is an E-Waste Management Company in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://jrrecyclingsolutionsltd.com.bd/services/e-waste-recycling
  67. Magura Recycled Paper Industries Ltd. – Magura Group, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.maguragroup.com.bd/index.php?area=online&action=BRPIL
  68. Magura Paper Mills Ltd., accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.maguragroup.com.bd/index.php?area=online&action=mpm
  69. Lakh-crore taka investment at risk as paper industry sinks into crisis – Daily Sun, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.daily-sun.com/post/789697
  70. BRAC Recycled Handmade Paper, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.brac.net/brac-enterprises/item/887-brac-recycled-handmade-paper
  71. (PDF) RECYCLING APPROACH OF WASTE PAPER AND PLASTIC IN KHULNA CITY OF BANGLADESH – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366557516_RECYCLING_APPROACH_OF_WASTE_PAPER_AND_PLASTIC_IN_KHULNA_CITY_OF_BANGLADESH
  72. Sustainable Expansion in Bangladesh’s Paper Sector: Economic …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://bbf.digital/sustainable-expansion-in-bangladeshs-paper-sector
  73. The existence of the domestic paper industry must be sustained – Country Today, accessed July 22, 2025, https://dailycountrytodaybd.com/story/the-existence-of-the-domestic-paper-industry-must-be-sustained
  74. The Weakening Paper Industry of Bangladesh – Problems and Prospects | PDF – Scribd, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/620148105/The-Weakening-Paper-Industry-of-Bangladesh-Problems-and-Prospects
  75. Paper industry crawls amid rising costs, overproduction, demand slump, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/industry/paper-industry-crawls-amid-rising-costs-overproduction-demand-slump-1045531
  76. Bangladesh Political Debacle: Bashundhara Paper Mills suffers severe losses amid exchange rate surge, sudden business stoppage, and LC restrictions; revenue falls by 40.11%, accessed July 22, 2025, https://thepulpandpapertimes.com/news/international/bangladesh-political-2239
  77. Blog | Mission Green Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://missiongreenbd.com/blog-details/plastic-waste-management-in-bangladesh-challenges-and-opportunities
  78. Bangladesh’s new government implements strong measures to eliminate single-use plastic, accessed July 22, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/bangladeshs-new-government-implements-strong-measures-to-eliminate-single-use-plastic/
  79. The government of Bangladesh announces its Solid Waste Management Rules 2021., accessed July 22, 2025, https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/government-bangladesh-announces-its-solid-waste-management-rules-2021
  80. Transforming waste management in Bangladesh: Policies and …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/transforming-waste-management-bangladesh-policies-and-implementation-challenges-869396
  81. Policy Packages for Bangladesh’s Circular Garment and Textile Transition, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.switchtocircular.eu/sites/default/files/publications/18-Feb-2025_Switch2CE_Policy-Report_Bangladesh-Circular-Textile-Transition.pdf
  82. Emerging concerns associated with E-waste exposure in Bangladesh – PubMed, accessed July 22, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40108034/
  83. Assessment of the Legal Framework Regulating Waste Management in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.universepg.com/ajssls/assessment-of-the-legal-framework-regulating-waste-management-in-bangladesh
  84. (PDF) Circular economy model and sustainable development nexus in Bangladesh – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366909225_Circular_economy_model_and_sustainable_development_nexus_in_Bangladesh
  85. bangladesh.un.org, accessed July 22, 2025, https://bangladesh.un.org/en/254809-revolutionizing-bangladeshs-textile-industry-unidos-switch2ce-initiative-paves-way-circular#:~:text=The%20circular%20economy%20is%20a,now%20part%20of%20this%20transformation.
  86. The Role of Local Communities in Bangladesh’s Post-Industrial Fabric Recycling Movement, accessed July 22, 2025, https://textilefocus.com/the-role-of-local-communities-in-bangladeshs-post-industrial-fabric-recycling-movement/
  87. Towards a circular textiles roadmap for Bangladesh 2025-2030, accessed July 22, 2025, https://textilefocus.com/towards-a-circular-textiles-roadmap-for-bangladesh2025-2030/
  88. Sustainable waste management in small towns of Bangladesh | The Financial Express, accessed July 22, 2025, https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/sustainable-waste-management-in-small-towns-of-bangladesh
  89. Techno-economic Impact of Incineration-Based Waste to Energy Generation Technology in Bangladesh: A Short Review and A Case Study – ChemRxiv, accessed July 22, 2025, https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/6777b7e16dde43c90828b5f5
  90. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Integrated Solid Waste Management … – AIIB, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.aiib.org/en/projects/details/2024/approved/Bangladesh-Integrated-Solid-Waste-Management-Improvement-Project.html
  91. US$200 million Financing announced for Solid Waste Management project in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.infrapppworld.com/news/us200-million-financing-announced-for-solid-waste-management-project-in-bangladesh