Bangladesh Garments and Textile Industry

by
Bangladesh Garments and Textile Industry

Section 1: Executive Summary

The garments and textile industry of Bangladesh, the undisputed engine of the nation’s economic ascent, stands at a critical inflection point. This report argues that the industry’s decades-long competitive advantage, built upon a foundation of low-cost labor and preferential trade access, is becoming strategically untenable. A confluence of forces—impending graduation from Least Developed Country (LDC) status, the rise of automation, and escalating global demands for ethical and sustainable production—is challenging the very core of its business model. The industry’s future viability, and by extension the economic stability of the nation, hinges on a decisive and comprehensive pivot towards higher value-added products, deep technological integration, aggressive market diversification, and a fundamental reinvestment in its human capital and environmental stewardship.

The findings of this analysis reveal a complex and often contradictory landscape. Economically, the industry’s dominance is staggering, accounting for over 80% of national exports and a substantial share of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), creating a high-risk dependency on a single sector. Structurally, the industry operates within a buyer-driven value chain characterized by a heavy reliance on imported raw materials, particularly for woven goods, and foreign control over marketing channels. This configuration severely limits the value captured within Bangladesh and concentrates it externally with global brands and intermediaries.

Socially and ethically, the sector presents a profound dichotomy. While it has been a vehicle for employment for millions, particularly women, persistent gaps between the statutory minimum wage and a calculated living wage fuel labor unrest and create a volatile operating environment. The violent crackdowns on labor organization efforts represent a significant reputational and operational risk for sourcing partners. This is compounded by the impending challenge of LDC graduation. The likely failure to secure the European Union’s GSP+ (Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus) status for apparel post-2029 poses an existential threat, with the potential imposition of tariffs up to 12% that could erode the country’s price competitiveness overnight.

Simultaneously, the industry faces the dual-edged sword of automation. While essential for future productivity and quality, automation threatens to displace a significant portion of the workforce, disproportionately affecting the female laborers who have historically formed the industry’s backbone. This necessitates a national strategy for a “just transition” that prioritizes upskilling and reskilling.

To navigate this challenging new era, stakeholders must pursue a multi-pronged strategic agenda. The government must engage in urgent trade diplomacy, reform labor laws to meet international standards, and invest in human capital. Industry associations must spearhead a collective shift from a cost-based to a value-based model, promote green technology adoption among smaller enterprises, and foster collaborative labor relations. For investors and factory owners, the path forward lies in investing in technology and people concurrently, strengthening backward linkages to reduce import dependency, and embracing radical transparency across the supply chain to mitigate risk and attract premium, long-term partners.

Section 2: The Engine of a Nation: Economic Significance and Macro-Impact

The garments and textile industry is not merely a sector within the Bangladeshi economy; it is the primary engine of its growth, the largest source of its foreign exchange, and the most significant formal employer for its population. Its scale and impact are so profound that the industry’s performance is inextricably linked to the nation’s overall economic health and social development.

2.1. Quantitative Analysis of Economic Contribution

The sector’s most visible impact is its overwhelming dominance in Bangladesh’s export portfolio. For decades, the Ready-Made Garments (RMG) sector has consistently generated over 80% of the country’s total export earnings.1 This trend has continued unabated into the current decade. In the fiscal year (FY) 2023-24, RMG exports reached $36.15 billion, accounting for 81.29% of the nation’s total goods exports of $44.47 billion.3 This represents a meteoric rise from just $4.5 billion in FY2002, illustrating the sector’s explosive growth over two decades.5 This consistent and massive inflow of foreign currency is the lifeblood of the nation’s economy, stabilizing its balance of payments and financing essential imports.7

The industry’s contribution to the national GDP is similarly substantial, though figures vary depending on the methodology and scope of measurement. The Foreign Investors’ Chamber of Commerce & Industry (FICCI) reports that the garments and textile sector contributes more than 13% of Bangladesh’s GDP, while other analyses place the figure as high as 20%.1 More conservative estimates from 2023 suggest a contribution of 10.35%.8 Regardless of the precise figure, the sector is an undeniable driver of the country’s robust GDP growth, which has averaged 6.5% since 2004.9 In FY24, Bangladesh’s total GDP reached approximately $459 billion, and the industrial sector, led by manufacturing, grew by 6.66%.10 This economic performance has attracted considerable capital, with an estimated $15 billion invested in the Primary Textile Sector (PTS) alone to build backward linkages.7

2.2. The Employment Powerhouse and Social Impact

Beyond the macroeconomic numbers, the industry’s most profound social impact lies in its role as the country’s largest formal employer. The sector provides direct employment to a workforce estimated to be between 4 million and 5 million people.2 This accounts for approximately 45% of all industrial employment in the nation.2

Historically, the RMG workforce has been overwhelmingly female, with early estimates suggesting women comprised 80-90% of all workers.11 This phenomenon was credited with driving a significant social transformation, providing millions of women from rural areas with their first formal source of income, thereby increasing their economic independence and social mobility.2 However, this narrative is evolving. More recent data indicates a notable decline in female participation, with the share of women in the workforce now estimated to be between 53% and 60%.2 This shift, linked to automation and changing skill demands, signals a critical change in the industry’s social composition and challenges its long-held reputation as the primary engine of female empowerment.

The industry’s economic footprint extends far beyond the factory floor. A powerful multiplier effect supports the livelihoods of an estimated 20 million people—nearly two crore—through a vast network of ancillary and backward-linkage industries.7 These include sectors like packaging, accessories, logistics, transportation, and urban services that have grown in tandem with the RMG behemoth. The Bangladesh Garments Accessories & Packaging Manufacturers & Exporters Association (BGAPMEA), for instance, represents approximately 2,000 member industries that employ over 750,000 people and contribute significantly to the value chain.14

This profound dependency, however, creates a paradox. The industry’s outsized contribution makes the entire national economy exceptionally vulnerable to shocks specific to the global apparel market. A sudden shift in trade policy, such as the potential loss of preferential market access in Europe, a downturn in consumer demand in the US, or a pandemic-induced cancellation of orders, could have a cascading and devastating impact on Bangladesh’s foreign reserves, GDP, and social stability.13 This concentration of economic activity in a single sector transforms industry-specific risks into national-level vulnerabilities.

The changing gender dynamics within the workforce also carry significant strategic implications. For global brands that have built their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) narratives around the theme of “empowering women” in Bangladesh, the declining female participation rate necessitates a re-evaluation of this messaging. It signals a need to shift social investment strategies from simply providing jobs to actively upskilling the female workforce to ensure they are not left behind by the industry’s technological transformation.

Table 2.1: Key Economic Indicators of the Bangladesh Garment & Textile Industry (FY 2018-2025)

Fiscal YearRMG Export Earnings (USD Billion)RMG as % of Total ExportsIndustry Contribution to GDP (%)Total Employment (Millions)Female Employment (%)
2017-18$30.6183.49%~12.26%~4.0~80%
2018-19$34.1384.21%~11.17%~4.1~70-80%
2019-20$27.9583.00%~11.00%~4.1~65%
2020-21$31.4681.16%~10.50%~4.2~60-65%
2021-22$42.6181.82%~10.00%~4.4~60%
2022-23$38.1482.15%10.35%~4.0~55-60%
2023-24$36.1581.29%~13.00% (Garments & Textile)~4.4~53-55%
2024-25$39.3581.49%(Not yet available)~5.0~55%

Note: Figures are compiled and synthesized from multiple sources.1 GDP and employment figures are estimates as official data varies. Female employment percentages reflect a notable downward trend reported in recent analyses.

Section 3: Deconstructing the Value Chain: Industry Structure and Operations

The operational architecture of the Bangladesh garments and textile industry is complex, defined by a dual-track system catering to separate markets, a critical divide in its backward linkage capabilities, and a value chain overwhelmingly dictated by external actors. Understanding this structure is essential to identifying its core vulnerabilities and opportunities for strategic improvement.

3.1. The Dual-Track System: Domestic vs. Export

The industry is fundamentally split into two distinct, parallel sectors with different characteristics, markets, and vulnerabilities.16

  • The Export Sector: This is the formal, organized, and globally recognized face of the industry. It consists of thousands of large-scale factories, many of which are clustered in designated Export Processing Zones (EPZs). These firms are geared towards producing for major international brands and are therefore subject to (at least nominally) international compliance audits and quality standards. This sector’s primary weakness is its profound dependency on external inputs and markets; it is almost entirely reliant on imported raw materials (especially for woven products) and foreign-controlled marketing and distribution channels.17
  • The Domestic Sector: In contrast, the domestic sector is less visible, highly fragmented, unorganized, and operates largely within the informal economy.16 It is composed of a vast network of small and medium-sized manufacturers, individual tailors, and home-based producers. This sector primarily serves the local population, producing lower-quality, cheaper garments using locally available fabrics or, in some cases, materials that have been illegally imported or diverted from the export supply chain. While it faces challenges of technological backwardness and financial insolvency, its informal nature and focus on the local market make it more resilient to global trade shocks.17

3.2. Backward Linkages: The Primary Textile Sector (PTS)

The strength of the industry’s backward linkages—its domestic capacity to produce yarn, fabric, and accessories—is a critical determinant of its overall competitiveness, lead times, and ability to capture more value. Here, a significant divergence exists between the two main apparel categories.

  • The Knitwear vs. Woven Divide: The knitwear sub-sector has achieved a remarkable degree of self-sufficiency. Local spinning, knitting, and dyeing mills can supply an estimated 85-95% of the total yarn and fabric required for producing knit RMG products like t-shirts and sweaters.3 This strong backward linkage gives the knitwear sector shorter lead times, greater flexibility, and higher domestic value addition. Conversely, the woven sub-sector remains heavily dependent on imports. Local mills can only meet 35-40% of the demand for woven fabrics used in items like shirts, trousers, and jackets.7 This reliance on imported fabric from countries like China, India, and Taiwan makes the woven sector more vulnerable to international price fluctuations and supply chain disruptions, and results in longer production lead times.
  • Accessories and Packaging: This segment represents a notable success story in backward integration. The Bangladesh Garments Accessories & Packaging Manufacturers & Exporters Association (BGAPMEA) oversees a robust domestic industry that produces nearly all necessary accessories, including corrugated cartons, poly bags, hangers, zippers, and labels.14 This sector earned an estimated $6.87 billion in FY 2023-24 through both direct exports and sales to the export-oriented RMG sector (deemed exports), showcasing its vital role in the overall value chain.14

3.3. The Buyer-Driven Ecosystem

The export sector operates as a textbook example of a “buyer-driven value chain”.17 This means that power resides not with the manufacturers, but with the large global retailers and brands that place the orders. These buyers—such as H&M, Zara, Walmart, and Target—dictate product design, specifications, quality standards, delivery timelines, and, most critically, price.

This power imbalance results in a significant portion of the value of a finished garment being captured outside of Bangladesh. Bangladeshi manufacturers are effectively squeezed in the middle, forced to absorb the costs of imported raw materials while simultaneously facing intense downward price pressure from their powerful clients. The primary value they are compensated for is the provision of low-cost labor.

This ecosystem is further complicated by a multi-tiered production network:

  • Intermediaries: A large percentage of export orders, estimated at 75-80%, are not placed directly with factories but are channeled through overseas buying houses. These intermediaries, often based in Hong Kong, South Korea, or Europe, act as agents for the final buyers, sourcing factories and managing production. While they provide a crucial link to the market, they also take a significant cut, further reducing the profit margins for the manufacturers themselves.17
  • Subcontracting Network: The manufacturing base is not monolithic. Research indicates a tiered structure where approximately 30% of firms are well-organized prime contractors capable of handling complex orders and some design input.17 However, the bulk of the industry consists of less-organized firms that take on a mix of direct and subcontracted work (around 50%) and a significant informal tier (around 20%) that operates purely as subcontractors performing basic Cut, Make, and Trim (CMT) tasks.2 This extensive and often opaque subcontracting network is a major blind spot. These smaller, often unregistered factories frequently fall outside the purview of safety and compliance monitoring programs, creating a high-risk environment where labor and environmental abuses are more likely to occur.19 This hidden tier represents a ticking time bomb for brand reputation and a major obstacle to achieving full supply chain transparency and accountability.

Section 4: A Legacy of Thread: Historical Evolution and Policy Shifts

The modern Bangladeshi garments and textile industry, while a product of the late 20th century, is built upon a rich and ancient legacy of textile artistry. Its trajectory from a nascent, state-controlled enterprise to a global export powerhouse was not an organic development but was catalyzed by a confluence of deliberate policy decisions, geopolitical opportunities, and the strategic transfer of knowledge.

4.1. Ancient Roots to Modern Industry

The region now known as Bangladesh has a history of textile production dating back millennia. It was globally renowned for its fine muslin, a fabric so delicate it was poetically described in ancient Rome as “woven winds”.21 This fabric, along with silk and other handloom products like Jamdani, established Bengal as a center of textile excellence long before the industrial era.12 While the modern industry bears little resemblance to these artisanal traditions, this deep cultural heritage of craftsmanship provides a historical context for the nation’s affinity with textile production.

4.2. Post-Independence Era (1970s)

Following its independence in 1971, Bangladesh’s new government adopted a socialist economic model. This led to the nationalization of most major industries, including the textile and jute mills previously owned by West Pakistanis.12 These nationalized factories were consolidated under the Bangladesh Textile Mills Corporation (BTMC). However, this period was marked by inefficiency, low productivity, and a lack of accountability, causing the state-owned enterprises to consistently run at a loss and the sector to stagnate.2

4.3. The 1980s Boom and Policy Catalysts

The 1980s marked a dramatic turning point, driven by a fundamental shift in government policy and a uniquely favorable international trade environment.

  • Privatization and Investment: Beginning in the early 1980s, the government moved decisively away from its socialist stance, initiating a wave of denationalization and privatization that returned many textile mills to their original or new private owners.2 This policy shift was coupled with active encouragement of private and foreign investment in the sector.
  • The Multi-Fiber Arrangement (MFA): This international trade agreement, established in 1974, proved to be the single most important external catalyst for Bangladesh’s RMG boom. The MFA imposed strict export quotas on established textile-producing nations like South Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong to protect the industries of North America and Europe.12 Bangladesh, having a negligible export volume at the time, was exempt from these quotas. This created a powerful incentive for manufacturers in quota-restricted countries to shift production to Bangladesh in a practice known as “quota-hopping.” The pioneering joint venture between South Korea’s Daewoo Corporation and Bangladesh’s Desh Garments Ltd. in 1977 is a prime example. This venture not only leveraged Bangladesh’s quota-free status but also facilitated a crucial transfer of technical expertise, machinery, and business models to the nascent local industry.12
  • Government Incentives: The government reinforced this momentum with a suite of supportive policies. These included offering duty-free import of capital machinery and raw materials for export-oriented factories, providing cash incentives for exports, and establishing the country’s first Export Processing Zone (EPZ) in Chittagong in 1980.12 Preferential market access to the European Union further solidified the industry’s export-oriented growth path.12

The conditions that fueled this initial boom—particularly the unrestricted, preferential market access guaranteed by the MFA and later by LDC status—were instrumental. The history of the industry demonstrates that its growth was not purely market-driven but was incubated in a “greenhouse” of favorable policy and geopolitical arbitrage. The impending expiration of these favorable conditions represents a fundamental challenge to the industry’s long-standing business model.

4.4. The Rise of Industry Institutions

As the RMG sector expanded rapidly, the need for collective representation, policy advocacy, and industry coordination became paramount. This led to the establishment of powerful trade associations that now play a central role in the industry’s governance. The Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) was founded in 1983, growing from just 12 members to over 4,000 today, primarily representing the woven garment sector.25 It was followed by the Bangladesh Garments Accessories & Packaging Manufacturers & Exporters Association (BGAPMEA) in 1989 to support the crucial backward linkage sector.14 Recognizing the distinct needs of the rapidly growing knitwear segment, the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA) was formed in 1996.28 These associations have become the primary interface between the industry, the government, and international stakeholders, lobbying for favorable policies, providing services to members, and managing the sector’s collective response to crises and opportunities.

Section 5: The Human Cost of Fast Fashion: Labor, Wages, and Safety

The remarkable success of Bangladesh’s garment industry has been built on the labor of millions of workers. However, this success has been shadowed by persistent and severe challenges related to wages, labor rights, and workplace safety. While significant progress has been made in structural safety following industrial tragedies, the domains of worker compensation and freedom of association remain areas of intense conflict and international concern, posing material risks to the industry’s stability and reputation.

5.1. The Wage Conundrum: Minimum vs. Living

A fundamental source of tension in the sector is the vast disparity between the legally mandated minimum wage and the estimated cost of living.

  • Current Wage Structure: Following contentious negotiations and widespread protests in late 2023, the government raised the monthly minimum wage for garment workers to 12,500 Bangladeshi Taka (BDT), equivalent to approximately $113.13
  • The Living Wage Gap: This figure falls drastically short of what is widely considered a living wage. Trade unions demanded a minimum of 23,000 BDT (~$195), a figure research suggests is the bare minimum to lift workers above the poverty line.32 Other estimates, such as the one by the Asia Floor Wage Alliance, place a living wage for Bangladesh at 53,104 BDT (~$450) per month.15 This enormous gap means that even a full-time garment worker cannot afford basic necessities like adequate food, housing, healthcare, and education for their family, trapping them in a cycle of poverty and debt.31
  • The Role of Brand Purchasing Practices: This downward pressure on wages is directly linked to the purchasing practices of global apparel brands. These buyers frequently engage in “price squeezing,” demanding lower prices and shorter production deadlines from their suppliers.33 This forces factory owners, who operate on thin margins, to cut costs wherever possible, with worker wages being the most common casualty. Research indicates that even brands with public commitments to supporting living wages often fail to adjust their purchasing prices to account for wage increases, effectively undermining their own stated goals.33

5.2. Labor Rights and Freedom of Association

Despite Bangladesh having ratified key International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions on freedom of association and collective bargaining, the on-the-ground reality for workers attempting to organize is one of repression and fear.

  • A History of Repression: Human Rights Watch reports and worker testimonies document a consistent pattern of anti-union tactics by factory management. These include intimidation, verbal abuse, threats of dismissal or physical harm, and actual assaults on union organizers.34 Factory owners have also been known to establish so-called “yellow unions”—unions that are controlled by the company—to create an illusion of compliance and prevent the formation of genuine, independent worker representation.34
  • The 2023 Wage Protests and Crackdown: The protests for a higher minimum wage in November 2023 were met with an unprecedentedly violent response from authorities. At least four workers were killed, hundreds were injured, and over 130 were arrested.32 In the aftermath, criminal charges were filed against an estimated 30,000 workers. This tactic of filing broad, often baseless charges against thousands of unnamed workers is a well-documented method of intimidation designed to create a chilling effect and suppress further labor activism.32
  • International Scrutiny and Legal Gaps: The state of labor rights in Bangladesh is under intense international scrutiny. The United States suspended Bangladesh’s GSP trade benefits in 2013, citing inadequate progress on worker rights and safety, a suspension that remains in effect.36 More recently, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has presented Bangladesh with a “Labour Action Plan,” explicitly calling for amendments to the Bangladesh Labour Act to align it with international standards and ensure a fair and transparent minimum wage process.36 Critics argue that the current law, even after amendments, contains significant bureaucratic hurdles that make it exceedingly difficult to legally register a union or call a strike.37

5.3. From Tragedy to Transformation: The Safety Imperative

In stark contrast to the lack of progress on wages and rights, the area of building and fire safety has undergone a revolutionary transformation, albeit one born from tragedy.

  • The Rana Plaza Catalyst: The collapse of the eight-story Rana Plaza building on April 24, 2013, which killed more than 1,100 workers and injured thousands more, was a watershed moment for the global fashion industry.35 The disaster, where managers had forced reluctant workers into a building with visible structural cracks, exposed the lethal consequences of a system that prioritized production speed over human life.35
  • The Accord on Fire and Building Safety: In the immediate aftermath, a unique and ground-breaking initiative was launched: the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. It was a five-year, legally binding agreement between international apparel brands and global trade unions (IndustriALL and UNI Global Union).38 The Accord’s power stemmed from its legally enforceable nature; signatory brands were legally obligated to ensure their supplier factories underwent independent safety inspections, implemented time-bound corrective action plans for any identified hazards, and had the financial means to do so. The agreement also established a worker complaints mechanism and enshrined the right for workers to refuse unsafe work without fear of reprisal.39
  • Evolution into the International Accord and RSC: The success of the initial Accord led to its renewal and evolution. The 2018 Transition Accord and the 2021 International Accord expanded the program’s scope and signatory base.38 A key development was the transition of the Accord’s in-country operations to a national tripartite organization. On June 1, 2020, the RMG Sustainability Council (RSC) was established, inheriting the staff, infrastructure, and safety protocols of the Accord office.38 The RSC, governed by representatives from industry, brands, and unions, now continues the critical work of inspections, remediation monitoring, and safety training for over 1,500 factories, covering more than 2 million workers.38

This history reveals a clear dichotomy of progress. Tangible, systemic improvements in factory safety have been achieved because the Accord model created direct legal and financial accountability for international brands. In contrast, issues like wages and union rights, which remain primarily within the purview of national law and local power structures, have seen little to no improvement. For global sourcing executives, this means that while the risk of a catastrophic building failure in an RSC-monitored factory has been significantly mitigated, the reputational and supply-chain disruption risk from labor unrest over wages and rights remains high and is arguably increasing. The focus of international scrutiny and activist campaigns is decisively shifting from the physical safety of factories to the economic safety and fundamental rights of the workers within them.

Section 6: The Environmental Ledger: Pollution and the Green Pivot

The rapid expansion of Bangladesh’s textile industry has come at a significant environmental cost, particularly in terms of water pollution and resource consumption. However, in a remarkable and strategic pivot, the sector has also emerged as an unlikely global leader in green manufacturing, creating a bifurcated environmental landscape of extreme pollution alongside world-class sustainability.

6.1. The Ecological Footprint

The environmental impact of the industry, especially its wet processing sub-sector (dyeing, washing, and finishing), is severe.

  • Water Pollution: The industry is a primary contributor to the degradation of Bangladesh’s rivers. Industrial pollution accounts for 60% of the contamination in the Dhaka watershed, with the textile sector being the second-largest polluter after tanneries.40 Factories discharge an estimated 200 metric tonnes of wastewater for every tonne of fabric produced, releasing a toxic cocktail of synthetic dyes, heavy metals (such as copper, lead, and mercury), acids, and other hazardous chemicals directly into waterways.40 This has had a devastating impact on rivers like the Buriganga and Shitalakshya, threatening aquatic ecosystems and the water supply for millions of people.41
  • Resource Consumption: The sector is exceptionally resource-intensive. It is estimated to consume 1,500 million cubic meters of water annually, much of it extracted from dwindling groundwater reserves.43 Its high energy consumption, largely reliant on fossil fuels, contributes significantly to Bangladesh’s greenhouse gas emissions. The global fashion industry, of which Bangladesh is a key part, is estimated to be responsible for up to 10% of total global emissions.41
  • Waste Generation: Production processes generate vast amounts of solid waste, including fabric scraps (known locally as ‘jhute’), off-specification yarn, and packaging materials. These are often disposed of improperly in landfills or open dumps, contributing to soil and groundwater contamination.41

6.2. The Green Revolution: A Leader in LEED

In a striking contrast to its pollution challenges, Bangladesh has proactively embraced sustainable manufacturing, becoming a global frontrunner in the development of certified green factories.

  • Green Factory Leadership: Bangladesh is home to the highest number of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified green garment factories in the world, as certified by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). As of late 2023, the country had 202 such factories, surpassing major competitors like China (173), Vietnam (69), and India (49).44
  • Benefits of Green Technology: These state-of-the-art facilities are designed and operated to maximize resource efficiency and minimize environmental impact. They incorporate technologies such as energy-efficient machinery, rooftop solar panels for renewable energy generation, advanced water treatment and recycling systems (which can reduce water consumption by over 50%), and comprehensive waste management programs. These investments not only reduce the factories’ ecological footprint but also lead to significant operational cost savings, making them more profitable and competitive in the long run.45

6.3. Financing and Facilitating the Green Transition

The pivot towards sustainability has been supported by key financial and partnership initiatives.

  • Green Transformation Fund (GTF): Recognizing the need to finance this transition, the Bangladesh Bank launched a $200 million Green Transformation Fund in 2016. The GTF is a refinancing scheme that provides low-cost, long-term loans to export-oriented industries for the purchase of environmentally friendly capital machinery and the implementation of green technologies.40
  • Effectiveness and Challenges of the GTF: The GTF has been an important enabler of green investment. However, its initial uptake was slower than anticipated. Factory owners cited a lengthy and complex approval process as a barrier. Furthermore, the fund was initially restricted to financing machinery purchases, whereas entrepreneurs often required more flexible, composite funding to cover a range of sustainability upgrades, including civil works and operational changes.43 In response, the scope of the GTF has been progressively expanded to include more sectors and a wider range of green investments.43
  • Partnership for Cleaner Textile (PaCT): This program, led by the World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation (IFC), has been highly influential. PaCT has worked directly with over 200 textile factories, providing technical guidance and advisory services on implementing cleaner production methods. The program has catalyzed impressive results, including saving 21 billion liters of water annually and generating $12.4 million per year in factory savings from improved resource efficiency.40 Crucially, PaCT played a key advocacy role that directly contributed to the government’s decision to establish the GTF.46

This evidence points to a sharply bifurcated environmental reality. On one hand, a highly visible, world-class cohort of LEED-certified factories are setting global benchmarks for sustainability, driven by the demands of top-tier international buyers. On the other hand, a much larger and less regulated segment of the industry, particularly the thousands of smaller dyeing and washing units operating within the subcontracting and domestic supply chains, continues to be a major source of pollution. For global brands, this means that sourcing from a “green” Tier-1 supplier is insufficient to mitigate environmental risk. The real liability often lies in the unmonitored wet processing units deeper within their supply chains. Consequently, green compliance is rapidly shifting from a matter of corporate social responsibility to a non-negotiable requirement for market access, especially with the advent of stringent regulations like the EU Green Deal.48 Factories that fail to make the green transition will find themselves increasingly excluded from premium global markets.

Section 7: Global Arena: Market Position, Competition, and Trade

Bangladesh’s position as the world’s second-largest apparel exporter is a testament to its manufacturing prowess, but this position is characterized by significant dependencies and is facing unprecedented threats from shifting global trade policies. The industry’s heavy concentration in a few key markets and its reliance on a handful of mega-buyers create an asymmetric power dynamic, while the impending loss of preferential trade status looms as an existential challenge.

7.1. Mapping the Export Landscape

The geographical and commercial distribution of Bangladesh’s RMG exports reveals a pattern of high concentration, which is both a source of strength and a significant vulnerability.

  • Primary Markets: The industry’s export destinations are dominated by Western economies. The European Union, as a single trading bloc, is the largest market, absorbing approximately 50% of Bangladesh’s total RMG exports.50 The United States is the largest single country destination, accounting for 18-19% of exports, followed by the United Kingdom with around 11%.2
  • Top 10 Destinations: An analysis of export data reveals that nearly 77% of all RMG exports are destined for just ten countries: the US, Germany, the UK, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Poland, Italy, Canada, and Japan.51 This extreme market concentration makes the industry highly susceptible to economic downturns or policy changes in these specific nations.
  • Major Buyers: The buyer landscape is similarly concentrated. A small number of global retail giants are responsible for a disproportionately large share of purchases. Sweden’s H&M, Spain’s Inditex (the parent company of Zara), and Ireland’s Primark are the top three buyers, with their combined purchases from Bangladesh totaling nearly $6 billion in a recent fiscal year.52 Other key buyers rounding out the top ten include Bestseller, Marks & Spencer, C&A, Uniqlo, Next, and Walmart.52 This reliance on a few mega-buyers gives them immense leverage in price negotiations and the setting of terms, contributing directly to the downward pressure on wages and factory margins.

7.2. The Competitor Matrix

Bangladesh operates in a fiercely competitive global market, where its primary advantage of low-cost labor is constantly being benchmarked against other major apparel exporting nations.

  • Key Rivals: The country’s main competitors include China, which remains the world’s undisputed largest exporter, followed by a group of strong regional players: Vietnam, India, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Turkey.53
  • Competitive Edge: The foundational competitive advantage for Bangladesh has always been its pricing, which is a direct result of some of the lowest labor costs in the world.5
  • Comparative Weaknesses: Each competitor presents a different challenge. Vietnam is often perceived as having higher labor efficiency, better infrastructure, and a more stable political environment.54 Turkey leverages its geographical proximity to Europe for faster lead times and boasts a more vertically integrated textile industry.54 India offers a vast and diverse product range, including non-cotton fibers, and has a much stronger domestic raw material base, reducing its import dependency.54

7.3. The LDC Graduation Precipice and the GSP+ Challenge

The entire business model that has underpinned the industry’s success for four decades is facing its most significant threat: the loss of preferential trade access.

  • The End of an Era: Bangladesh is on track to graduate from the United Nations’ list of Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 2026. This graduation will mark the end of its eligibility for special trade preferences, most critically the European Union’s “Everything But Arms” (EBA) scheme, which grants LDCs duty-free, quota-free access to the EU market. Following a three-year transition period, these benefits will cease in 2029.56
  • The GSP+ Hurdle: The only viable path to retaining duty-free access to the EU market post-2029 is by qualifying for the GSP+ scheme, a special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance. To qualify, a country must ratify 27 international conventions on human rights, labor rights, environmental protection, and good governance. It must also meet two specific “vulnerability” criteria set by the EU.57
  • Failure on Vulnerability Criteria: While Bangladesh has ratified the required conventions, it fails to meet a key economic vulnerability criterion. One of the criteria stipulates that a country’s share of imports under the GSP scheme into the EU must be less than a certain threshold (currently 6.5% of total EU GSP imports). Bangladesh’s apparel exports are so successful and voluminous that its share is approximately 9%, well above the ceiling.57 The devastating implication of this rule is that even if Bangladesh meets all other political and human rights conditions for GSP+, its primary export product—apparel—would be deemed too “competitive” and would be excluded from the scheme’s benefits. As a result, Bangladeshi garments would face the EU’s standard Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariffs, which average around 12%.58

This is not a minor regulatory hurdle; it is a catastrophic scenario. The imposition of a 12% tariff would instantly erase the price advantage that has been the cornerstone of the industry’s competitiveness. It would place Bangladesh at a severe disadvantage against competitors like Vietnam, which has a free trade agreement with the EU, and other nations that may retain GSP+ benefits. This looming “tariff cliff” represents an existential threat that invalidates the industry’s historical business model and forces a radical rethinking of its future strategy.

Table 7.1: Top 10 RMG Export Markets for Bangladesh (FY 2024-25, July-May)

RankCountryExport Value (USD Billion)Year-on-Year Growth (%)Share of Total RMG Exports (%)
1United States$7.0917.00%~19.39%
2Germany$4.5710.39%~12.50%
3United Kingdom$4.044.00%~11.05%
4Spain$3.161.61%~8.64%
5France$2.018.65%~5.50%
6Netherlands$2.09 (FY25 data)21.21% (FY25 data)~5.72%
7Poland$1.70 (FY25 data)9.77% (FY25 data)~4.65%
8Italy$1.54 (FY25 data)(Not specified)~4.21%
9Canada$1.30 (FY25 data)12.07% (FY25 data)~3.56%
10Japan(Over $1 billion annually)9.13% (FY25 data)~2.73%

Note: Data compiled from multiple sources covering FY2024-25 and FY25.50 Some figures are for the full fiscal year while others are for the first 11 months, indicating the most recent available data. Percentages are calculated based on a total RMG export figure of $36.56 billion for the first 11 months of FY2024-25.

Table 7.2: Competitive Analysis: Bangladesh vs. Key Apparel Exporters

CountryKey AdvantageKey WeaknessLabor Cost (Index)Vertical Integration LevelLead Time (Index)Key Export Markets
BangladeshLowest labor cost, large-scale production capacityHigh import dependency (woven), political instability, infrastructure deficitsVery LowLow (Woven), High (Knit)Moderate-LongEU, US, UK
VietnamHigher efficiency, political stability, FTA with EURising labor costs, smaller scale than BangladeshLow-ModerateModerateShort-ModerateUS, EU, Japan
IndiaStrong domestic raw material base, diverse product rangeBureaucratic hurdles, higher labor cost than BangladeshModerateHighModerateUS, EU, UAE
CambodiaVery low labor costs, GSP benefitsLower skill level, infrastructure challengesVery LowLowModerateUS, EU
TurkeyProximity to Europe, strong textile tradition, high qualityHigher labor costs, political instabilityHighVery HighShortEU, UK, US
IndonesiaCompetitive costs, large workforce, natural resourcesInfrastructure issues, environmental concernsLow-ModerateModerateModerateUS, Japan, EU

Note: This table provides a strategic, qualitative comparison based on information synthesized from sources.8 Indices are relative for comparative purposes.

Section 8: The Next Decade: Future Trajectory and Strategic Recommendations

The coming decade will be transformative for the Bangladesh garments and textile industry. The convergence of automation, the erosion of preferential trade access, and rising global standards for sustainability and ethics will force the sector to evolve or risk decline. Survival and future growth will depend on navigating the complex trade-offs between productivity and employment, and on making strategic investments in technology, value addition, and human capital.

8.1. The Automation Imperative: Productivity vs. People

The adoption of automation is no longer a choice but a necessity for survival in the competitive global market.

  • The Drive to Automate: An estimated 80% of factory owners in Bangladesh plan to invest in automated technologies within the next two years.61 The goal is to enhance productivity, improve product quality and consistency, reduce operational costs, and shorten lead times to meet the demands of international buyers.61 Technologies like automatic pocket setters, laser cutters, and automated sewing units can dramatically increase efficiency and reduce the manpower required for specific, repetitive tasks.62
  • The Social Cost: This technological shift comes with a significant social cost: large-scale job displacement. Recent studies have already attributed a 30-31% reduction in the RMG workforce to the initial wave of automation.63 Projections from organizations like the ILO are even more stark, suggesting that automation could eliminate as much as 60% of the sector’s current jobs by 2040.66 The most affected roles are entry-level positions like helpers and operators in the sewing and cutting sections.63
  • The Gendered Impact: The wave of automation poses a disproportionate threat to female workers. Women have historically dominated the sewing line operator roles that are most susceptible to being automated.66 Furthermore, due to a combination of social norms and unequal access to education and technical training, women are less likely to be selected for the new, higher-skilled roles of operating and maintaining automated machinery. This trend is a key driver of the observed decline in female participation in the RMG workforce and threatens to exacerbate gender inequality.61
  • The “Just Transition”: This looming crisis underscores the urgent need for a “just transition” strategy. This requires a proactive, coordinated effort from the government, industry, and development partners to invest heavily in upskilling and reskilling the existing workforce. Without robust social safety nets and large-scale training initiatives to prepare workers for the jobs of the future, the industry’s technological advancement could trigger a major social crisis.61

8.2. Moving Up the Value Chain: Diversification and Innovation

To compensate for the erosion of its low-cost advantage, the industry must strategically move into higher-value segments of the market.

  • Product Diversification: A critical pathway to higher profit margins is to shift production away from basic cotton t-shirts and trousers and towards more complex, higher-value products. This includes technical sportswear, formal outerwear, lingerie, and garments made from man-made fibers (MMFs) like polyester and viscose.49 Bangladesh currently lags behind competitors like Vietnam and India in its capacity to produce MMF-based apparel, making this a key area for investment and development.49
  • Market Diversification: To mitigate the risks associated with its heavy dependence on the EU and US markets, the industry must aggressively pursue opportunities in non-traditional markets. There is significant growth potential in Asia (Japan, India, South Korea), Australia, and Latin America.7 Building stronger trade relationships with these regions is a crucial risk management strategy.
  • Technological Integration and E-commerce: Embracing the full suite of Industry 4.0 technologies is essential. This goes beyond factory-floor automation to include digital design and sampling, data analytics for production planning, and AI for supply chain optimization.48 Furthermore, the rise of e-commerce presents an opportunity to bypass traditional intermediaries. Developing direct-to-consumer (D2C) sales channels could allow manufacturers to capture a greater share of the final retail price, significantly improving margins.7

8.3. Strategic Recommendations for Stakeholders

Navigating the challenges of the next decade requires concerted and coordinated action from all major stakeholders.

For Government & Policymakers:

  • Urgent Trade Diplomacy: Launch an immediate and high-level diplomatic initiative targeting Brussels to negotiate a modification of the EU’s GSP+ vulnerability criteria. The argument must be made that applying the standard rules to Bangladesh’s unique, apparel-dominated export economy would be counterproductive to the GSP scheme’s development goals. Simultaneously, accelerate negotiations for Preferential or Free Trade Agreements with other key and emerging markets.
  • Comprehensive Labor Law Reform: Move beyond piecemeal amendments and undertake a comprehensive overhaul of the Bangladesh Labour Act to genuinely align it with core ILO standards on freedom of association and collective bargaining. This is critical not only for worker rights but also as a non-negotiable condition for securing future trade preferences like GSP+.36
  • Invest in a “Just Transition”: Establish a national-level “Just Transition Fund,” co-financed by the government, industry contributions, and international development partners. This fund should support social safety nets for displaced workers and finance a massive expansion of vocational training institutes focused on equipping the workforce, particularly women, with the digital and technical skills required for an automated and sustainable garment industry.

For Industry Associations (BGMEA/BKMEA):

  • Develop a Unified Sector-Wide Strategy: Lead the development of a cohesive 10-year strategic plan to transition the industry from a “cost-based” to a “value-based” competitive model. This plan should include ambitious, measurable targets for increasing the share of MMF-based exports, diversifying into new product categories, and expanding into non-traditional markets.
  • Democratize Green Adoption: Create targeted programs to help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) access the financing (through mechanisms like the GTF) and technical expertise needed to adopt green technologies. This is essential to prevent the emergence of a two-tiered industry where only the largest players can meet international sustainability standards.
  • Modernize Labor Relations: Proactively shift from a historically confrontational stance towards labor to a more collaborative one. Take the lead in establishing a credible, transparent, and annual wage-setting mechanism in partnership with independent unions and the government. This would help break the destructive five-year cycle of tension and violent protest, creating a more stable and predictable business environment.70

For Factory Owners & Investors:

  • Adopt a Dual Investment Strategy: Recognize that investing in technology and people are two sides of the same coin. Pair investments in productivity-enhancing automation with robust, in-house programs for reskilling and upskilling the existing workforce to operate, maintain, and manage these new systems.
  • Invest in Backward Linkages: To counter rising import costs, shorten lead times, and better comply with rules of origin for trade agreements, make strategic investments in the domestic Primary Textile Sector. This could involve direct investment in new spinning and weaving mills for woven fabrics or forming long-term joint ventures with local PTS players.
  • Embrace Radical Transparency: Utilize digital tools like blockchain and product passporting to create fully transparent and traceable supply chains. This transparency must extend beyond Tier-1 suppliers to include subcontractors and wet processing units. In the new era of mandatory due diligence (especially in the EU), this level of transparency is no longer a marketing tool but a fundamental requirement for mitigating compliance risk and securing business with premium, forward-looking brands.

Works cited

  1. Fact Sheet: Building a Sustainable Textile and Apparel Market in Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2018/fact-sheet-building-a-sustainable-textile-and-apparel-market-in-bangladesh
  2. Textile industry in Bangladesh – Wikipedia, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textile_industry_in_Bangladesh
  3. Report Name: Cotton and Products Annual, accessed July 22, 2025, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_Dhaka_Bangladesh_BG2025-0005.pdf
  4. Export Performance – BGMEA, accessed July 22, 2025, https://bgmea.com.bd/page/Export_Performance
  5. Contribution to GDP. | Download Scientific Diagram – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Contribution-to-GDP_fig3_362382636
  6. The Textile Industry in Bangladesh: Growth Trends, Challenges, and Future Prospects, accessed July 22, 2025, https://i-proclaim.my/journals/index.php/gdeb/article/view/789
  7. THE GARMENTS AND TEXTILE SECTOR: A CHANGE MAKER FOR BANGLADESH’S ECONOMY – FICCI, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ficci.org.bd/en/blog/the-garments-and-textile-sector-a-change-maker-for-bangladeshs-economy
  8. Bangladesh vs Vietnam: who leads the apparel market?, accessed July 22, 2025, https://bangladeshbeyondthelabel.com/news/bangladesh-vs-vietnam-who-leads-the-apparel-market
  9. Textiles in Bangladesh – Economy – Leadership and Democracy Lab – Western University, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.democracylab.uwo.ca/Archives/2017_2018_research/textiles_in_bangladesh/textiles_in_bangladesh__economy.html
  10. Bangladesh’s Economy – During FY2023-24 (FY24) – Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Dhaka (MCCI), accessed July 22, 2025, https://mccibd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Bangladesh-Economy-FY-23-24.pdf
  11. 50 Bangladesh textile industry statistics fashionistas should know – Good Maker Tales, accessed July 22, 2025, https://goodmakertales.com/50-bangladesh-textile-industry-statistics/
  12. Bangladesh’s Track Record in Textiles: An Analysis – Fashinza, accessed July 22, 2025, https://fashinza.com/brands-and-retail/news/bangladeshs-track-record-in-textiles-an-analysis/
  13. What’s happening in Bangladesh’s garment industry? – Economics Observatory, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.economicsobservatory.com/whats-happening-in-bangladeshs-garment-industry
  14. BGAPMEA | Home, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bgapmea.org/
  15. Important facts and figures about Bangladesh and its textile sector – FEMNET e.V., accessed July 22, 2025, https://femnet.de/en/materials-information/country-profiles/bangladesh.html
  16. Structure of Textile and Garment Industry in Bangladesh | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326929158_Structure_of_Textile_and_Garment_Industry_in_Bangladesh
  17. (PDF) STRUCTURE OF TEXTILE AND GARMENT INDUSTRY IN …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364033282_STRUCTURE_OF_TEXTILE_AND_GARMENT_INDUSTRY_IN_BANGLADESH
  18. The 40-year historical journey of vertical integration in Bangladesh’s garment manufacturing, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/the-40-year-historical-journey-of-vertical-integration-in-bangladeshs-garment-manufacturing
  19. Assessing the true size of the garment industry in Bangladesh and why it matters, accessed July 22, 2025, https://bhr.stern.nyu.edu/quick-take/assessing-the-true-size-of-the-garment-industry-in-bangladesh-and-why-it-matters/
  20. New report highlights the need for solutions to tackle exploitation of workers and children in Bangladesh’s garment sector – University of Nottingham, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/news/bangladesh-garment-sector
  21. Textile arts of Bangladesh – Wikipedia, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textile_arts_of_Bangladesh
  22. History of the Textile Industry in Bangladesh – TEXSAS, accessed July 22, 2025, https://texsasbd.com/blogs/history-of-the-textile-industry-in-bangladesh
  23. The Relationship between Growth and Quota Restrictions Concerning the Textile and Clothing Industry: A Study on RMG Sector of Bangladesh, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ijefm.co.in/v7i8/6.php
  24. Bangladesh’s Garment Industry: Future growth in a changing world – The Daily Star, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.thedailystar.net/anniversary-supplement-2024/bangladesh-the-world-stage/news/bangladeshs-garment-industry-future-growth-changing-world-3543371
  25. Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association – Wikipedia, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Garment_Manufacturers_and_Exporters_Association
  26. BGMEA at a glance, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bgmea.com.bd/page/aboutus
  27. Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) – Devex, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.devex.com/organizations/bangladesh-garment-manufacturers-and-exporters-association-bgmea-137917
  28. BKMEA, accessed July 22, 2025, https://bkmea.com/
  29. Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association – Wikipedia, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Knitwear_Manufacturers_and_Exporters_Association
  30. BKMEA at a Glance, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bkmea.com/about/at-a-glance
  31. Waging the Fight for a Living Wage – DOL Blog, accessed July 22, 2025, https://blog.dol.gov/2024/04/30/waging-the-fight-for-a-living-wage
  32. Bangladesh Crackdown – Clean Clothes Campaign, accessed July 22, 2025, https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/bangladesh-crackdown-2024
  33. Securing living wages for Bangladesh’s garment workers – Swedwatch, accessed July 22, 2025, https://swedwatch.org/themes/securing-living-wages-for-bangladeshs-garment-workers/
  34. Bangladesh: Protect Garment Workers’ Rights – Human Rights Watch, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/02/06/bangladesh-protect-garment-workers-rights
  35. Bangladesh: 2 Years After Rana Plaza, Workers Denied Rights | Human Rights Watch, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/04/22/bangladesh-2-years-after-rana-plaza-workers-denied-rights
  36. Align labour law with global standards: US agency | The Daily Star, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.thedailystar.net/business/news/align-labour-law-global-standards-us-agency-3839671
  37. Examining the Threads: Bangladesh’s Ready-Made Garment Industry Under Global Scrutiny, accessed July 22, 2025, https://sports-entertainment.brooklaw.edu/fashion/examining-the-threads-bangladeshs-ready-made-garment-industry-under-global-scrutiny/
  38. Bangladesh – International Accord, accessed July 22, 2025, https://internationalaccord.org/countries/bangladesh/
  39. International Accord Archives – UNI Global Union, accessed July 22, 2025, https://uniglobalunion.org/workers-rights/international-accord/
  40. How Dialogue is Shifting Bangladesh’s Textile Industry from Pollution Problem to Pollution Solution – World Bank, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2017/02/15/how-dialogue-is-shifting-bangladeshs-textile-industry-from-pollution-problem-to-pollution-solution
  41. The Environmental Impacts of Textile Dyeing Industries in Bangladesh – IRJAES, accessed July 22, 2025, http://irjaes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/IRJAES-V5N2P97Y20.pdf
  42. Environmental Impact of Bangladesh’s Top Green Garment Factories – Pawla Fashion, accessed July 22, 2025, https://pawlafashion.com/top-green-garment-factories/
  43. BANGLADESH BANK’S FUND FOR A GREEN GARMENT SECTOR, accessed July 22, 2025, https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstreams/ada614cc-510e-458c-bc01-d306b416299a/download
  44. BGMEA | Home, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bgmea.com.bd/
  45. Bangladesh apparel industry makes progress in ‘eco-friendly’ manufacturing – Mongabay, accessed July 22, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/2023/09/bangladesh-apparel-industry-makes-progress-in-eco-friendly-manufacturing/
  46. Bangladesh’s Textile Sector Weaves a Clean, Sustainable Future, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.ifc.org/en/stories/2010/clean-sustainable-bangladesh-textile
  47. Green Transformation Fund (GTF): How Bangladeshi Businesses Can Get Low-Cost Loans – Greenbud BD, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.greenbudbd.com/green-transformation-fund-bangladesh-low-cost-loans/
  48. Bangladesh’s Garment Industry: Future growth in a changing world, accessed July 22, 2025, https://unitedgroup-bd.com/2024/08/06/bangladeshs-garment-industry-future-growth-in-a-changing-world/
  49. RMG Outlook 2025: Bangladesh’s Future in Apparel – LightCastle Partners, accessed July 22, 2025, https://lightcastlepartners.com/insights/2025/04/rmg-challenges-opportunities/
  50. Bangladesh’s RMG exports notches 8.84% growth in FY25 | At a Glance – BSS, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bssnews.net/at-a-glance/291544
  51. Exports rise in top 10 markets – Prothom Alo English, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.prothomalo.com/business/local/mdqk2oatkx
  52. Top 10 foreign companies that source garments from Bangladesh | Prothom Alo, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.prothomalo.com/business/local/avyctbraea
  53. India can capture textile exports share of Bangladesh, Cambodia and Indonesia amid US tariffs: SBI – The Economic Times, accessed July 22, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/india-can-capture-textile-exports-share-of-bangladesh-cambodia-and-indonesia-amid-us-tariffs-sbi/articleshow/122481734.cms
  54. Top 5 best alternatives to Bangladesh clothing manufacturers, accessed July 22, 2025, https://thesynerg.com/top-5-best-alternatives-to-bangladesh-clothing-manufacturers/
  55. www.jobmer.org, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.jobmer.org/2019/vol3_issue1_article4_full_text.pdf
  56. Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) | Pro Bono, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.sidley.com/en/us/probonolanding/trade-for-development-initiative/projects/bangladesh-garment-manufacturers-and-exporters-association-bgmea/
  57. THE END OF DUTY-FREE: Preparing Bangladesh’s Garment Industry for GSP-Plus, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ibtbd.net/the-end-of-duty-free-preparing-bangladeshs-garment-industry-for-gsp-plus/
  58. Proposed EU GSP Scheme for 2024-34: What Bangladesh must do now, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/analysis/proposed-eu-gsp-scheme-2024-34-what-bangladesh-must-do-now-327511
  59. Generalised Scheme of Preferences – EU Trade – European Union, accessed July 22, 2025, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/development-and-sustainability/generalised-scheme-preferences_en
  60. Opinion | Can Bangladesh get prepared for EU’s GSP-plus? | gsphub, accessed July 22, 2025, https://gsphub.eu/news/opinion-bangladesh-gspplus
  61. RMG sector embraces automation – Will workers be left behind? – Daily Sun, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.daily-sun.com/post/773730
  62. Automation is future of Bangladesh apparel industry – Textile Today, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/automation-is-future-of-bangladesh-apparel-industry
  63. 30.58% drop in jobs in Bangladesh RMG sector due to automation: Study – Fibre2Fashion, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/apparel-news/30-58-drop-in-jobs-in-bangladesh-rmg-sector-due-to-automation-study-299831-newsdetails.htm
  64. Bangladesh: Automation causes 31% decline in garment labour force, highlighting urgent need for a just transition – Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/bangladesh-automation-causes-31-decline-in-garment-labour-force-highlighting-urgent-need-for-a-just-transition/
  65. Bangladesh: Report finds automation in RMG sector cuts workforce by 30%, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/bangladesh-report-finds-automation-in-rmg-sector-cuts-workforce-by-30-impacting-women-older-workers-and-entry-level-jobs/
  66. Navigating the Challenges of Automation: Empowering RMG workers to Just Transition, accessed July 22, 2025, https://etibd.org/blog/navigating-the-challenges-of-automation-empowering-rmg-workers-to-just-transition-4173/
  67. RMG Industry Automation: Balancing Growth and Worker Wellbeing – LightCastle Partners, accessed July 22, 2025, https://lightcastlepartners.com/insights/2025/03/rmg-industry-automation-growth-worker-wellbeing/
  68. What’s next for Bangladesh’s garment industry, after a decade of growth? | McKinsey, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/whats-next-for-bangladeshs-garment-industry-after-a-decade-of-growth
  69. Future of Bangladesh’s textile industry amidst political uncertainty – Times of India, accessed July 22, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/fashion/buzz/future-of-bangladeshs-textile-industry-amidst-political-uncertainty/articleshow/112774329.cms
  70. 1 Cornell GLI Policy Brief: Minimum wage-setting in Bangladesh’s apparel industry November 2024 Minimum wage-setting is a now – The ILR School, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/sites/default/files-d8/2024-11/cornell-gli-brief-bangladesh-november-2024.pdf